Topic:	Guess who?
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 16.Feb 2007 - 14:40	Okies seeing as it seems to be the major topic right now, who do you think has multiple ID's? You can say different forums if you like or just this one - air your suspicions people - out those puppeteers! You can even use this thread to confess if you like........
Hen Posts: 772 Posted: 17.Feb 2007 - 20:44	Posters who aren't what they seem, eh? This this one qualify? She seemed gorgeous, but have you seen her lately? It's abysmal. tongue firmly planted in cheek here
Coady Posts: 1928 Posted: 17.Feb 2007 - 23:14	...There are a couple of names no one seems to dare to mention............ We live in interesting times.
Hen Posts: 772 Posted: 18.Feb 2007 - 00:01	Go on. I dare you too!
Masterclass Posts: 880 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 10:41	sentinel and Hunlef.
Fulub-le-Breton Posts: 4387 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 13:15	There may be sock puppets on this board but again i would suggest a tour of the BBC board to see some masterful sock puppetry. The Cornish Democrat The Breton Connection
Hen Posts: 772 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 19:40	Masterclasssentinel and Hunlef. Nah. They're definitely different. For a start Hunlef is a bird married with children. And for another thing, sentinel asked for my view on a Cornish matter. Definitely different.
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 20:30	Quote...There are a couple of names no one seems to dare to mention............ QuoteGo on. I dare you too! Hen and Janet Midwinter. They are the same person. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
Hen Posts: 772 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 20:50	Nah. Fooled you me handsome. Not me name. Sorry you were mislead.
Hen Posts: 772 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 20:51	Janet is a really big forum user isn't she?
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 21:01	Janet Midwinter does not post on this forum, Hen does. Janet sends the emails to other forum posters.. Emails I received over the weekend from Janet (Hen) Midwinter ------------------------------------- Email 1. Subject: Missing you more and more each day. Just can't get used to the lack of abuse my posts are getting on C24. What with you, Shazzy and Hunny being absent. I can't believe that I am able to rationally debate points without all the personal attacks? Oh woe is me. ------------------------------------ Email 2. Subject: Oh woe is me. No-one is posting abusive personal attacks against me on C24 anymore. Miss you guys. Deeply. ------------------------------------- Email 3. Subject: Not likely me 'ansomes. Awwwww? You won't be coming back to show your ignorance on legal issues? You won't be coming back to just abuse me for being me? What a shame. I'll just have to visit you when I am over next. Then you can abuse me to my face. Cue your stupid wife to start laughing or cackling. I'd be concerned over her meds if I were you Davey-boy. ------------------------------------- Email 4. Subject: Fear not me hearties. I'll be coming to help with all thing Cornish ... soon. Looking forward SO much to meeting you. Can't wait. I hope you will be as excited as I am. Love and kisses to both. ---------------------------------------- Email 5. Subject: How we can all have a laugh ... At all the vile things you have done to people and abuse you have posted when we all meet. I might even send a pressie over for you both before I get there. Just so you know that I DO know exactly how to find you. Whoops. I am starting to sound a bit like that the brain-dead woman. Whatsername? Something like Spaz I believe. My fondest regards to you both. ---------------------------------------- Email 6. Subject: RE: REMOVE Oh I get it. This is like an email strip request. What is it you'd like me to remove first Frenchie? And are you sure Spaz wont be jealous? She'd probably only wet her knickers laughing. Which is most likely the only way she ever gets them wet. I tremble in anticipation of your commands. ----------------------------------------- Email 7. Subject: sniff Oh, boo-hoo.! Don't tell me that our relationship is over before it commenced. Otherwise I might just have to submit your contact email address to a number of spamming sites. That would make me so upset. It could be dreadful for your business as well! I hadn't thought of that. Oh if only you had responded .... -------------------------------------------- This last email was not sent by Janet from her usual hotmail account, she set up a new yahoo email called "kisses4bothyou2@yahoo.co.uk" So it looks like if you take a holiday for a week and not post on C24 then Janet (Hen) Midwinter feels the impulsive need to send threatening and abusive emails to you. True colours of the Chicken from down under.. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
chris Posts: 1405 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 22:51	I can think of someone else Janet Midwinter might be.....
porthia1947 Posts: 705 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 23:09	Mike said QuoteI can think of someone else Janet Midwinter might be..... Yes Mike I think the clue is in some of the terms used e.g. "Cue your stupid wife to start laughing or cackling. I'd be concerned over her meds if I were you Davey-boy.". Sounds like it might be a posting from someone working in the psychiatric nursing profession with a room with a view over a billabong. edited by: porthia1947, Feb 19, 2007 - 11:23 PM
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 23:15	Yup, I used to live in Australia so the lingo told me all. Unbelievable.
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 23:24	Wasn't really meant to be a serious thread
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 19.Feb 2007 - 23:51	There's a common theme in a lot of this. It's people trying to get one up on someone else. When they don't succeed, they act illogically like sending stupid emails. I could write for ages on it.
Hunlef Posts: 1838 Posted: 20.Feb 2007 - 22:47	If that Janet Midwinter is another pseudonym of the old scraggly chicken, 'Hen', then this person seems rather nasty and twisted - a bit like her psychopathic husband who, when push came to shove, realised that his hatred for and bigottry towards the Cornish, was not in his best career interests. I hope that Chris will take a dim view of those who send disgusting and sordid e-mails to members of this forum and ban them to oblivion. I might be forthright in my comments on this forum but, I am a strong adherent of the principles of equality fairness and a strong believer in human rights for all and I abhor all forms of racism and discrimination. It says much to me that people like 'Hen' who works for the Federal authorities in Canberra, has, so far, been inclined to voice any support for Sentinel who has highlighted serious UK government wrong-doing in the form of lying to parliament, the Council of Europe and the High Court by people including the current Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Ruth Kelly, and her side-kick lackey, Ian Naysmith.
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 20.Feb 2007 - 23:03	Yes, those emails were something else. I can hardly believe that anybody would write such stuff. She followed the same path as her husband, picked on some misrepresented half story from the BBC and sided with it just to annoy local people. Why did she keep posting on here? It's to try to get one over on people, I guess. When it fails anything goes. I still find it incredulous but I guess water finds its own level
Fulub-le-Breton Posts: 4387 Posted: 21.Feb 2007 - 16:36	Don't worry she and a load of other miscriants from this board are now to be found on the BBC Cornwall forum. The Cornish Democrat The Breton Connection
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 21.Feb 2007 - 17:07	ooooh - who is she then? This is the thread for 'outing' people's secret identities after all
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 21.Feb 2007 - 22:19	She is a 'War Hen' from L.A. who will not be bothering us anymore.. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
Hunlef Posts: 1838 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 00:04	LA? I thought she was from Canberra?
Masterclass Posts: 880 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 02:11	Given, that there is no real proof, like IP headers and things, then I will reserve my judgement on this one. I mean, if one wanted to out a someone, then thye would show real proof? A) It's only fair B) I'm not sure I do believe it and finally C) Well, I wouldn't, would I?
Hunlef Posts: 1838 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 08:15	You wouldn't recognise proof if it landed on your thick head, mee 'ansome. Pity you continue to peddle your jibes and sneers - would be much better if you were to admit that the government has committed a great wrong-doing towards the Cornish national minority in its repeated lies about them to parliament, the Council of Europe and the High Court by Ruth Kelly, Ian Naysmith and barrister, Philippa Whipple. But, you wouldn't would you, pard? Finally, I'm quite certain that Frenchie has the proof. Do such people as the stuffed chicken from Canberra really want her true identity plastered here and all over the Internet? I don't think so, little boy! edited by: Hunlef, Feb 22, 2007 - 07:15 AM
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 12:46	What was posted isn't proof, it's just a post. I would personally imagine that if Frenchie feels confident enough to publish it then he must have something concrete, but that is not the same thing. Neither is not replying to a post about the government being all dishonest for that matter - draw whatever conclusions you want, they are only of value to the individual; publishing them adds no value to a post from an audiences POV. The right to remain silent isn't an admission of guilt, complicity or agreement.
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 13:43	MasterclassGiven, that there is no real proof, like IP headers and things, then I will reserve my judgement on this one. I mean, if one wanted to out a someone, then thye would show real proof? A) It's only fair B) I'm not sure I do believe it and finally C) Well, I wouldn't, would I? I would expect (C) of you Masterclass. These types, and we've had a few, follow a fairly set pattern, which I've outlined above. It always ends up badly. One consolation is that it makes life a bit more predictable and you can have some faith in human fallibility prediction.
Shaz online Posts: 1304 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 20:09	End of Dec I posted a thread asking for mining images, Hen replied with an address, phone number etc for a Cornish mining site. The following day I received an email from Mike Davis who runs a Cornish mining site saying that Janet Midwinter had contacted him on my behalf Bizarre We have also had pm's from the chicken, signed Janet...
Shaz online Posts: 1304 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 20:24	Masterclass put your playstation down for a minute and use your brain. Don't you think that if Hen hadn't have written those emails, she would be on here feathers flying defending herself!
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 20:42	ShazEnd of Dec I posted a thread asking for mining images, Hen replied with an address, phone number etc for a Cornish mining site. The following day I received an email from Mike Davis who runs a Cornish mining site saying that Janet Midwinter had contacted him on my behalf Bizarre We have also had pm's from the chicken, signed Janet... That's part of the obsessive behaviour and trying to get one up on you. Can you remember the bloody Nancledra bus times and emails to and frow, from someone in Canberra for Christ's sake. It's not normal . The mining photos are similar - I'll find them, like if no-one else can use Google. Canberra is possibly one of the most boring places I have ever been to (twice) but there are limits
Shaz online Posts: 1304 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 20:49	Thing is Mike, I posted over and out to Hen in a post a while before that, her pattern was too evident to me, I never responed to a post of her's again after that, including the mining one, guess it got to her
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 21:00	QuoteWhat was posted isn't proof, it's just a post. I would personally imagine that if Frenchie feels confident enough to publish it then he must have something concrete, but that is not the same thing. I cannot post a received email as proof, it has to be cut and pasted. If you really want to know the truth you could come down to Newquay and I would be quite happy to show you the originals. Emails cannot be falsely created nor tampered with. The way Hen jumps into posts at every available opportunity is quite evident on this forum. She was 'online' when I posted her disgusting email texts and vanished within minutes, never to be seen again. As grum says... "The right to remain silent isn't an admission of guilt, complicity or agreement." But common sense should also prevail, based on a persons known characteristics, Hen likes nothing more to 'dig' at people's posts. Her silence in this case is deafening. Her real identity is known and she knows better than to come back here. I do not think C24 will suffer from her absence. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 22.Feb 2007 - 21:07	QuoteI do not think C24 will suffer from her absence. It's like a breath of fresh air
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 23.Feb 2007 - 01:42	Nah, I didn't think you'd put something up you couldn't back up Frenchie, just mainly making a point to Hunlef that 'obvious' and 'proof' are not necessarily synonymous. Shame that people get so cross about messageboards though; I liked hen on here because whatever may have transpired, she is clearly an intellegent person. I feel that perhaps without such people around to test theories on and sharpen political claws, a loss of momentum can occur. Ah well, time will tell I guess
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 23.Feb 2007 - 09:29	grumNah, I didn't think you'd put something up you couldn't back up Frenchie, just mainly making a point to Hunlef that 'obvious' and 'proof' are not necessarily synonymous. Shame that people get so cross about messageboards though; I liked hen on here because whatever may have transpired, she is clearly an intellegent person. I feel that perhaps without such people around to test theories on and sharpen political claws, a loss of momentum can occur. Ah well, time will tell I guess Grum, you obviously don't expect to be taken seriously
Fulub-le-Breton Posts: 4387 Posted: 23.Feb 2007 - 16:00	Frenchie, Can you tell from which continent those e-mails came from? The Cornish Democrat The Breton Connection
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 23.Feb 2007 - 16:39	QuoteCan you tell from which continent those e-mails came from? Why? They do have an MSN advert type signature from a 'AU' address though. You could always ask Hen next time she posts here.. Not sure when that wil be though. She has PM'd me a few times as Janet. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
Masterclass Posts: 880 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 03:27	So, it's true, if you say it is then? Atm, I'm happy to believe that is it isn't. The "-e-mails". And why do I think this? Because Hen as asked questions, andpulled up documents that would stand up to scrutiny. Documewnts that others have cited. So she went digging. And didn't accept the truth that was told her. Just because someone does some research doesn't mean that they've Got to give 18% of their efforts to culturatl projects, does it Hunlef, eh? Oh, btw, you know that document which was important. I'll be having a meal at 15, so can bring you a forst hand review.
Masterclass Posts: 880 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 03:29	Someone rearraanged my keyboard.
Shaz online Posts: 1304 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 21:05	MasterclassSomeone rearraanged my keyboard. Along with your head
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 22:13	Interesting that since Ivan appeared daily on the BBC board at the same time (early morn oz) with an obsessive down on the CSP and insinuated that Diane was picked on on this board, he has vanished since it was pointed out it was Hen who sent emails to people! Might be coincidence, might not be!
Shaz online Posts: 1304 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 22:44	Did notice that Ivan always posts after 8pm, and the ref to Diane could only be someone from long since on this board or a total obsessive who has read through all posts which would rule out a young student unless they are really bloody sad...
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 23:36	QuoteBecause Hen as asked questions, andpulled up documents that would stand up to scrutiny. Documewnts that others have cited. So she went digging. And didn't accept the truth that was told her. Exactly! And her complete disapearance from this forum shows how hard she is researching the truth about the 'emails' I refered to, doesn't it? If you had a greater degree of insight you would have noticed that almost all of Hen's posts have one common theme - to go against anything pro-Cornish that is posted on this forum. Her desire to play devils advocate goes beyond the extremes of normality: obsessive bordering on insanity. I suppose people who spend their working life dealing with dumb animals may find dificulties with a species that answers back. ps, your keyboard seems more pissed than reaaranged.. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 24.Feb 2007 - 23:52	Masterclass, why do you try and defend the indefensible? Hen's behaviour on here and her man's before were just not normal. This smart attitude they tried to portray that finished up badly shows they have not got sense to get in out of the rain. If you showed that kind of behaviour in a place of work you would be ostracised. Why behave like it on here?
Diane Posts: 789 Posted: 25.Feb 2007 - 02:07	Good grief! this is supposed to be Cornwall lite, but it sounds more like Parliament prattling over sometime other that getting on with the subject. I don't understand what you're on about re: Hen or Strop, both added debate here. They didn't rubbish Cornwall any more than I do on occasions. Because we're not there, doesn't mean we're not interested in what happens there. Everything is not perfect anywhere, so we say so. As for insults, well a few of you could take a look in a mirror sometime. I've been insulted on here, but I try not to take much notice of it. I suppose being an xpat, our opinions don't count for much. We might see things differently because we're not so insular as many Cornish folk are.
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 25.Feb 2007 - 02:18	QuoteThey didn't rubbish Cornwall any more than I do on occasions. The difference being Diane is that you do not send emails to forum members threatening to jepardise their business or make sexual insults to their partners. That is why I still respect your views and welcome your opinion. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 25.Feb 2007 - 23:41	It really was supposed to be a 'Lite' topic.....
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 25.Feb 2007 - 23:43	..and now it's becoming full of posts from people remarking on how light it should be. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
Shaz online Posts: 1304 Posted: 25.Feb 2007 - 23:47	grumOkies seeing as it seems to be the major topic right now, who do you think has multiple ID's? You can say different forums if you like or just this one - air your suspicions people - out those puppeteers! You can even use this thread to confess if you like........ Grum I think it's rather naive of you to start a topic like this and expect it to remain lite
Hunlef Posts: 1838 Posted: 26.Feb 2007 - 00:14	My CSP contacts have advised me that they have received e-mail enquiries from a Janet Midwinter about the "Stannary Party". On a cursory visit to the BBC 'Devonshire' (sorry, Cornwall) forum, I notice that the scumbag, Ivana Jellical, uses the same expression. Clearly, the scumbag Jellical is none other than he who, according to one ex-prat at least, made such a worthwhile contribution to this forum, that other well-known psychological scumbag, anti-Cornish facist, Stroppygit!
Mike Posts: 2538 Posted: 26.Feb 2007 - 00:14	Grum, I fail to see how these things are 'lite'. We're looking at a persistent pest, in the form of Hen. She just logged on here for months to be disruptive. Surely you were not taken in?
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 26.Feb 2007 - 00:29	Because whoever is saying it is irrelevant - the content is all that really matters. I made this thread to keep nonsense out of the real discussion topics that were being overrun by Poirot-style interrogations. Didn't know all this behind-the-scenes rubbish was going on
frenchie Posts: 1691 Posted: 26.Feb 2007 - 00:39	Hen dared forum members to expose double identities on this 'lite' thread. She got an answer. The fact that her 'double' likes to send private emails to forum members threatening their business and making derogatory sexual remarks was her business. I'm sorry she wasn't light enough for you. Or should I say 'I apologise in advance'.. 1d3az b3c0m3 th0ught5, th0ughtz b3c0m3 1n1t1at1v35, 1n1t1at1v3z b3c0m3 act10n5, act10nz br1ng chang3..
grum Posts: 477 Posted: 26.Feb 2007 - 00:42	You ruined my thread with real stuff!!!!!