search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  Kernowak: A proposed Standard Written Form for the Cornish language
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 Next Page
Bottom 

Kernowak: A proposed Standard Written Form for the Cornish language

Pokorny Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:07

Pokorny

registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 213

Status: online
@Palores, FlammNew: thank you! Would it be fair to conclude that ['pEdEr] with a short stressed <e> (as in the recording), while not in line with the prescribed pronunciation of KK, is still representative of the way most people (including KK users) speak nowadays?
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
marhak Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:17

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 3274

Status: offline
last visit: 10.10.08
Caligula saw the sense of appointing his horse, Incitatus, as a Consul of Rome (the horse probably had more sense than the rest of 'em out together). I think that Paddy and I would better off carrying out a Goky Watch.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Pokorny Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:19

Pokorny

registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 213

Status: online
FlammNewSo we have 'een' [i:n] and 'oon' [u:n] and [Yn:] and [Ydn] and [In] and [Idn]. I know fluent speakers of many years' standing (and a few sitting) who pronounce <unn> as in the MP3 or as 'een'. Are these acceptable as 'accents' or 'dialects' of 21st Century Cornish or must the idolaters be hounded from the Duchy with flaming torches? icon_biggrin


To the designers of KD, the varieties of spoken Revived Cornish are acceptable dialects which should be spared excessive streamlining. Opinions in other camps may differ.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
marhak Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:20

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 3274

Status: offline
last visit: 10.10.08
Armed to the teeth.
Top  Profile send PM
 
FlammNew Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:20

FlammNew

registered: Mar. 2006
Posts: 1814

Status: offline
last visit: 27.03.08
I think it could depend on the perceived syllable break: PED-er or PE-der. The latter would have a longer E than the first.

You raise an important point: while choosing a SWF, do we force people to change their everyday, intelligible pronunciation to fit in with the SWF group's ideas of how things were said 400-odd years ago, or do we accept that Cornish has developed and moved on since the 20th century revival, and build a SWF around 21st Century Cornish as is currently used?



dukkha-samudaya-nirodha-magga
Top  Profile send PM
 
Pokorny Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:27

Pokorny

registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 213

Status: online
From a KD viewpoint, the answer to your question is clear:
The SWF itself should be a standard *written* - not *spoken* - form. The question of standard pronunciation should be considered separately. While this may sound more complicated than a straightforward adapt-to-the-standard-or-perish policy, it is the only way to treat today's speakers (and the varieties they use) with the respect they deserve.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
FlammNew Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:42

FlammNew

registered: Mar. 2006
Posts: 1814

Status: offline
last visit: 27.03.08
Well fine, but surely there's an easier solution? Let everyone pronounce Kemmyn the way they currently do, as UC or UCR or LC, and move on to promoting the language. You are never, ever, ever going to find a SWF that pleases everybody so we should stop trying, pick a SWF that is acceptable to a simple majority of users and get on with the more important business, that of working together to ensure the future of the language.



dukkha-samudaya-nirodha-magga
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 20.06.2007, 14:55

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 1159

Status: offline
last visit: 09.10.08
FlammNewYou are never, ever, ever going to find a SWF that pleases everybody so we should stop trying, pick a SWF that is acceptable to a simple majority of users and get on with the more important business, that of working together to ensure the future of the language.
We've done pretty well atracting supporters to our own compromise orthography. Some are even KK users. One even surprised me by signing up, as he was not so positive in discussions on the Kernowak list. (Note to Keith: the names will be published in due course; you can resist asking now.)

What do you think will happen if the Commission says that the SWF should be a Fifth Form and none of the existing four forms, FlammNew?

I think the result would be discussion and collaboration. We already saw this when UC, UCR, and RLC users talked together about the way forward. The result was KS.

Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
FlammNew Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:16

FlammNew

registered: Mar. 2006
Posts: 1814

Status: offline
last visit: 27.03.08
How many of the 500 or so fluent speakers have signed up? Not a majority, I'll warrant. If you have 10% of them signed up I'll be surprised. I'm not a better but I'd wager that you could easily get a majority of fluent speakers to back Kemmyn.

You keep banging on about how Kemmyn hasn't persuaded 100% of speakers to use it, well no SWF will, KS included! If you think otherwise I'm afraid you are deluding yourself.



dukkha-samudaya-nirodha-magga
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvyl Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:22

morvyl

registered: Feb. 2006
Posts: 388

Status: offline
last visit: 14.05.08
gokyDevon had better get ready for the influx of KK refugees when the revoluton succeeds, and El Presidente issues his decree banning improper speeach,and mandatory diacritics on all Road Signs,
and Dorkvyl and Marhak and his Horse take control of the language police.



Goky,
I really don't know what's wrong with you. FlammNew and Nosdan asked a question concerning the pronunciation of KK/KS <unn/udn> and I tried to answer it to the best of my abilities and all you can contribute is silly remarks. Why? I believe that I was inclusive of all forms of Cornish in my answer.
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvyl Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:24

morvyl

registered: Feb. 2006
Posts: 388

Status: offline
last visit: 14.05.08
Palores
QuoteRe the mp3 on Warlinenn: what do you all think about the stressed vowel we hear in <peder>?


It is too short. The whole recording is heavily influenced by English pronunciation. Difficult to avoid. Needs practice.


It's been prosodically shifted! icon_wink
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvyl Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:28

morvyl

registered: Feb. 2006
Posts: 388

Status: offline
last visit: 14.05.08
FlammNewThis MP3 from the Warlinenn website contains the pronunciation of unn I use.


I find the in the recording to be a little on the longish side. This probably is because English speakers aren't used to producing a tense high vowel short.

Quantity and quality is frequently misinterpreted by KK speakers many of whom believe that KK = long English "ee", and KK <y> = short English "i". This is not the case.

Many also fail to distinguish <oe> from <ow>, though I've heard the recommended pronunciations as well.



edited by: morvyl, Jun 20, 2007 - 03:30 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvyl Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:30

morvyl

registered: Feb. 2006
Posts: 388

Status: offline
last visit: 14.05.08
Don't know why the above came through underlined...
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:31

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 1159

Status: offline
last visit: 09.10.08
FlammNewHow many of the 500 or so fluent speakers have signed up?
Do you think there are 500 fluent speakers?
QuoteNot a majority, I'll warrant. If you have 10% of them signed up I'll be surprised. I'm not a better but I'd wager that you could easily get a majority of fluent speakers to back Kemmyn.
It's not a plebescite. It's an opt-in show of support. We have in a few weeks since the publication of the KS draft convinced a number of people (all of whom use the internet, a subset of Cornish users I am sure) that it was a direction for the language that they could support.

QuoteYou keep banging on about how Kemmyn hasn't persuaded 100% of speakers to use it, well no SWF will, KS included! If you think otherwise I'm afraid you are deluding yourself.
I think that we have succeeded in creating a compromise which a number of people who use UC, UCR, RLC, and even KK have said that they could support. That would be a number of people willing, for the good of the language, to move from what they are using to something else. For something better.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
morvyl Posted: 20.06.2007, 15:33

morvyl

registered: Feb. 2006
Posts: 388

Status: offline
last visit: 14.05.08
FlammNewI think it could depend on the perceived syllable break: PED-er or PE-der. The latter would have a longer E than the first.

You raise an important point: while choosing a SWF, do we force people to change their everyday, intelligible pronunciation to fit in with the SWF group's ideas of how things were said 400-odd years ago, or do we accept that Cornish has developed and moved on since the 20th century revival, and build a SWF around 21st Century Cornish as is currently used?


That would mean that we accept a version of Cornish that has undergone the prosodic shift... I like that.

Personally, I pronounce ["pEd@r] with a short vowel.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 Next Page


Users online:
Pokorny - Eddie-C - P_Trembath

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views