search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  And the Cornish word for today is . . . . .
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next Page
Bottom 

And the Cornish word for today is . . . . .

Nosdan Posted: 16.07.2008, 17:41

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 1169

Status: offline
last visit: 20.11.08
tut tut marhak... a month before someone brought up something about spelling... icon_lol

"yn an" isnt grammatically incorrect as far as I understand, its much the same as in English... "it is ~ It's" ...I think.



Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
TheElvenLord Posted: 16.07.2008, 18:15

TheElvenLord

registered: Sep. 2007
Posts: 957

Status: offline
last visit: 21.11.08
Yn (as in -ly) causes 5th state (i think) and therefore it becomes Yn hwir.

Okay,

Ev a bal, yn an bal, gans y bal

And marhak, we'll decide by what the SWF says

TEL

Everything is impossible until it is not.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Eddie-C Posted: 16.07.2008, 18:44

Eddie-C

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 1003

Status: online
TheElvenLordYn (as in -ly) causes 5th state (i think) and therefore it becomes Yn hwir.
<yn> has 2 distinct roles in Cornish, as I understand it from Nance's dictionaries.
(1) as a preposition, meaning 'in', it causes no mutation, e.g.
-- yn gwylfos. in a wildnerness
-- yn gwyr. in truth

(2) as an adverbial particle, it causes state-5 Mixed mutation, e.g.
-- yn ta. well
-- yn whyls. wildly, savagely.

As 'gwyr' can be either a noun (=truth, right, justice, fact) or an adjective (=true, real, genuine), there are two possible phrases:
-- yn gwyr = in truth (yn + noun)
-- yn whyr = truly. (yn + adj.)

However, I have heard that only 'yn gwyr' is actually attested in traditional Cornish. Still, Nance gives both yn-whyr and yn-wyr in his dictionaries, and by now it looks like both 'yn whyr/yn wyr' and 'yn gwyr' are too firmly established in ordinary Revived Cornish usage for either to be ousted.

TheElvenLordAnd marhak, we'll decide by what the SWF says

TEL
As I understand it, the SWF only addresses issues of spelling, not those of idiom, grammar, lexicon or syntax. And, even within that narrow confine, not everyone shares your apparent blind faith in the SWF's infallibility.

As regards <yn an>, my understanding is that the abbreviation to <y'n> is obligatory, rather than optional.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

KS: selven an Furf Screfys Savonek? -- Ya, hep wow!

Kernewek Hengovek? -- Sur, nyns us nahen!
Top  Profile send PM
 
Nosdan Posted: 16.07.2008, 18:50

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 1169

Status: offline
last visit: 20.11.08
Surely even if it is obligatory, we can use a little artistic license.

But i'm not convinced that it is...? Or is it? hmmm... icon_biggrin

Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 16.07.2008, 21:16

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 3903

Status: online
The SWF only caters for orthography, not grammar. And who's "we"?

And I hate and loathe the Anglo-Saxon hw. Always have, always will (it was getting a little dull around here, Nosdan icon_evil ). In any case the SWF allows the traditional wh.



edited by: marhak, Jul 16, 2008 - 08:19 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
Eddie-C Posted: 16.07.2008, 21:24

Eddie-C

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 1003

Status: online
Nosdan on 'yn an'Surely even if it is obligatory, we can use a little artistic license.
This shortening of 'an' happens elsewhere in Cornish, of course, such as after other prepositions, conjunctions, and the verb 'bos'. Consider these examples:

(1) yn an; dhe an; yu an; yma an; ha an (or 'hag an'); a an; re an, etc.

. . . or . . .

(2) yu'n; dhe'n; yu'n; yma'n; ha'n; a'n; re'n, etc.

To my admittedly inexpert eye, set (1) looks like faulty beginner's Unified Cornish, while set (2) looks correct.

I don't think 'a little artistic licence' comes into it.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

KS: selven an Furf Screfys Savonek? -- Ya, hep wow!

Kernewek Hengovek? -- Sur, nyns us nahen!
Top  Profile send PM
 
Nosdan Posted: 17.07.2008, 07:36

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 1169

Status: offline
last visit: 20.11.08
Im well aware of the contractions, and I agree that the first set look a little untidy. But I really havn't seen anything written down that fudementally says you can NOT write them like that.

An in music/poetry in all languages theres is always some degree or rule bending. Wrinting "yn an" rather than "y'n" is hardly the biggest sin ever.

icon_biggrin

On a similar not.... Why doesn't "A allav" and similar verbs with "A a" Contract???





edited by: Nosdan, Jul 17, 2008 - 07:39 AM

Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
pietercharles Posted: 17.07.2008, 09:00



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 520

Status: offline
last visit: 12.10.08
Eddie-C Consider these examples:

(1) yn an; dhe an; yu an; yma an; ha an (or 'hag an'); a an; re an, etc.

. . . or . . .

(2) yu'n; dhe'n; yu'n; yma'n; ha'n; a'n; re'n, etc.

To my admittedly inexpert eye, set (1) looks like faulty beginner's Unified Cornish, while set (2) looks correct.



yu'n? Does Unified join 'yu' and 'an' like this? It didn't when I learned Unfied!

As for 'yn an' and poetic licence, I think the answer is to name a place An Bal. Then you can say 'yn An Bal' just as everyone I know says 'yn An Gannas' because to say 'y'n Gannas' sounds very odd indeed. Hope that helps, looking forward to subsequent cries of derision.
Top  Profile send PM
 
pietercharles Posted: 17.07.2008, 10:55



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 520

Status: offline
last visit: 12.10.08
It's little wonder that we find it hard to move on when nonsense like the objection to 'yn hwir' gets raised on a regular basis.

It is one of the more bizarre aspects of our revival that a perfectly well-formed, grammatical utterance can be shunned, and openly criticised in conversation, because it is not found in the texts.
Why should it be found in the texts?
How can anyone be daft enough to suggest that it cannot be good Cornish because scribes happened not to use it in the manuscripts that have come down to us?

Every day we must utter hundreds of phrases that are not found in the texts, all of them ignored.
But dare to say 'yn hwir' and you get pounced on by people desperate to show their competence in Cornish by suggesting they are familiar with the texts.

Usually, I find, they've not even read them - they just got told about 'yn hwir' down the pub one night.

Whoever started this nonsense has a lot to answer for.
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 17.07.2008, 11:08

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1828

Status: offline
last visit: 09.11.08
NJW did not like it, in "Form and content" he cites
14 uses of 'yn gwir' in the texts says the phrase is not an adverb but a prepositional phrase , "in truth' so I don't know whether 'yn' would mutate or not.

The blog The Great Goky Blog
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 17.07.2008, 12:40

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 3903

Status: online
Robert Morton Nance started it, Pieter. If those who spoke and wrote Cornish as their everyday language didn't write "yn hwir/whir", then it must be right.

Today, though, we seem to like perpetuating mistakes and then claiming they're "correct", rathe rthan correcting them ourselves when the mistake is pointed. However, it seems that the issue is more about WHO points them out.



edited by: marhak, Jul 17, 2008 - 11:41 AM
Top  Profile send PM
 
pietercharles Posted: 17.07.2008, 12:58



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 520

Status: offline
last visit: 12.10.08
It has nothing to do with who points an error out.

It makes no sense at all to say that a phrase that follows all the rules of grammar as we understand them cannot be right because we cannot find an example of it in the texts. No sense whatsoever. It immediately 'writes off' hundreds of phrases that we use every day.

To follow up on Goky's point, NJW is absolutely right - the phrase 'yn gwir' is not an adverb. It is a prepositional phrase meaning 'in truth' and it's found 14 times in the texts. But we're not talking about the prepositional phrase 'yn gwir'. We're talking about the adverb 'yn hwir' meaning 'truly', which isn't found in the texts, but which, by any rules that we understand, is perfectly good Cornish.
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 17.07.2008, 15:55

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 3903

Status: online
Is there really a difference?

<hw> is truly awful - <hw> is, in truth, awful.
I am truly sorry - I am, in truth, sorry.

Don't both versions mean exactly the same thing? Might that not been precisely how Cornish scribes were using the phrase?

I stick with "yn gwir", then I know that I'm on solid ground.
Top  Profile send PM
 
TheElvenLord Posted: 17.07.2008, 16:33

TheElvenLord

registered: Sep. 2007
Posts: 957

Status: offline
last visit: 21.11.08
Why do you hate the <hw> ??
I am not in favour of either - I dont mind <Wh> or <Hw>.

@ Eddie

I do not have "Blnd faith" in the SWF - I support the SWF because it is the only way forward. NOTHING will happen while people are squabbling like small children over whose sweet it is "Oooh, this is my sweet" - "No it isnt, it is MY sweet". I support the SWF because it puts a stop to the infantile arguements over how to spell things - for all that is holy, its only a spelling, its not the end of the world!

TEL

Everything is impossible until it is not.
Top  Profile send PM
 
davidtreth Posted: 17.07.2008, 17:06



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 210

Status: offline
last visit: 19.07.08
Surely all that proves marhak, is that there are two different grammatical structures which allow you to express the same thing. This is the case in any language.

It may be that the scribes preferred yn gwir, but this doesn't mean yn hwir is grammatically incorrect. It is simply a matter of style.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 Next Page


Users online:
marhak - ThomasLeigh - Allister - GrahamHart - Eddie-C - Shiner - P_Trembath - Nev - Sir-Francis-Basset

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views