search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  SWF, For or against
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 Next Page
Bottom 

SWF, For or against

Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 20:45

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
morvranThe Kesva was set up by the Gorseth of Cornwall and the FOCS to take over responsibility for promoting and governing the language, and when there were sufficient people in the language community arrangement were made for most Kesva members to be elected. Suggestions that anything underhand has taken place have no basis in fact and are just malicious sniping.
So you claim. I do not believe you. And I know this: the personal anomosity that members of the Kesva have for people who criticize Kernowek Kebmyn is no secret to anyone. I have no confidence in the Kesva. I do not acknowledge their linguistic expertise, their moral claim to the language, or any claim that they "govern" it.
QuoteWhat you have written above shows what we all know by now, that you are not part of our community, don't begin to understand it, and are without doubt a danger to it.
It is quite certain that you wish people to believe this. It is likelier than not that you and I will never enjoy a collegial or convivial pint. You are not a part of the community to which I belong, Keith. You're a mean-spirited amateur without the walk to back up his talk.

Quote
QuoteIn any case you have on hand a fully searchable corpus and so could find all the necessary proof (or disproof) in an afternoon if you really wanted to.
You really are a big baby, aren't you, Keith? A grown-up linguist would do his job, which is to present the data.

A grown up linguist would not suffer the likes of you for five minutes.[/quote]This just goes to show how little you actually understand about linguistics. But I don't need your approval, Keith.

Quote
QuoteThere are in fact rather few rhymes with 'God' -- that in itself ought to tell you something, given the subject matter of the texts.
'God' is written lots of ways, including <du>, and the burden is on you to show all the words 'God' rhymes with and all the words those words rhyme with. If /yw/ is there, the rhymes will show it. But they do not, I am sure.

Oh what a confort your faith must be to you! You are sure, you haven't bothered to look, but you are sure![/quote]Do feel free to prove me wrong. I have indeed looked at the rhymes for 'God', and its spellings. Even a cursory look shows your theory to be dubious at best.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
goky Posted: 17.03.2008, 20:50

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1234

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
And the Kesva probably has no confidence in Michael Everson.


Blog Gokki,(Gokky's Blog)Skodhyewgh An Furv Skrifys Savonek !
Kernewek rag an Gour Gwir updated.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
fwltur Posted: 17.03.2008, 20:50



registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 161

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
morvran... Lhuyd had a special sign for Welsh 'll' which he used once in JCH almost certainly by accident.


I think Keith is right that the one time Lhuyd uses a reversed l was a typo. There are obvious typos in the Welsh translation. Line 10 he uses an lh instead of the special reversed l. Notice lines 9 and 10 in the Cornish part where in line 9 he writes o`l but in line 10 oll. He does write guelha in lines 9 and 10 where Boson writes guella. Lhuyd says on p. 228 of A CORNISH GRAMMAR " L has two pronunciations in the oldest MSS. That which is common in English and all other languages, and that which is at present peculiar to Welsh". From that I think he probably did not hear the Welsh ll in the Cornish of his time. Again on p. 2 he says "LH is peculiar to the Welsh". On p. 225 Lhuyd lists his Cornish alphabet. There is no lh included.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 20:52

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
pietercharles
Nosdan
Quoterecent discoveries we made about tth/lh/nh in Tregear are extremely interesting

Sorry to show my lack of linguistic knowledge... but whats ineresting about them? and what did you discover???

Looks like you're not going to get an answer, Nosdan, so I'll tell you what the rumour is (it will then no doubt be corrected in a flash and you'll get the information you're seeking).
I was installing software on a new computer today, Mr I-Can-Insult-People-With-Impunity-Because-I-Am-Anonymous PieterCharles. And you wonder why we dislike you Kebmynites so much. All we get is abuse from you. And all that for daring to show that Kernowek Kebmyn was riddled with mistakes.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
goky Posted: 17.03.2008, 20:57

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1234

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
Everson, I know you have as much intelligence as a one celled amoeba, but it is 'Kernewek Kemmyn' that is the brand name, not the stupid retarded side form you are using.


Blog Gokki,(Gokky's Blog)Skodhyewgh An Furv Skrifys Savonek !
Kernewek rag an Gour Gwir updated.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Mike Posted: 17.03.2008, 21:06

Mike

registered: Jul. 2004
Posts: 2134

Status: offline
last visit: 12.05.08
Evertype said:
Quotethe personal anomosity that members of the Kesva have for people who criticize Kernowek Kebmyn is no secret to anyone.


and in the same breath:
QuoteI have no confidence in the Kesva. I do not acknowledge their linguistic expertise, their moral claim to the language, or any claim that they "govern" it.


Hypocrisy at best. It sounds as if you have two mouths.

Members of the Kesva have demonstrated quite a good knowledge of linguistics on here. They run examinations which I don't think anyone else does and of course they publish a lot.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
pietercharles Posted: 17.03.2008, 21:28



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 161

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
EvertypeI was installing software on a new computer today, Mr I-Can-Insult-People-With-Impunity-Because-I-Am-Anonymous PieterCharles. And you wonder why we dislike you Kebmynites so much. All we get is abuse from you. And all that for daring to show that Kernowek Kebmyn was riddled with mistakes.


What on earth are you talking about, Mr I-Can-Insult-People-With-Impunity-Because-I-Am-A-Smart-Fellow-As-I-Told-You-All-More-Than-Once ?

I have NEVER wondered why you dislike Kebmynites so much.

Because I didn't realise you DID dislike Kebmynites so much.

When you say WE, just who are you talking about? Clearly it includes you, but who else? Eddie-C? Marhak? Williams? All of Agan Tavas?

On whose behalf are you talking when you write 'we'?

What I now DO wonder is how many non-Kebmynites actually DO dislike Kebmynites. The ones I actually know (rather than those that are just a name on this board) don't seem to share your animosity.

Could you clarify the position, please?
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 21:43

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
Sure. Can you tell us your real name?

None of us dislikes ordinary users of Kernowek Kebmyn. They are not the ones who come here and revile us. Many of them have worked with us, in fact, or given us their candid views of what we were trying to do.

Those people are leagues away from some of the anonymous nasties we have to put up with here. If you can't see the difference, well, fine.

And I shall say "we" with impunity so long as you hide behind a nickname, PieterCharles.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
pietercharles Posted: 17.03.2008, 21:56



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 161

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
So it's actually just you, Evertype, that dislikes "us Kebmynites" so much.

When you write "we" (with impunity) you're just talking about yourself...a bit like, if not identical to, the "royal we"?
Top  Profile send PM
 
Bardh Posted: 17.03.2008, 21:57

Bardh

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 815

Status: offline
last visit: 07.05.08
Po ann pennskrivor ... po ann dyn a'n zyveus c'hwann!
Top  Profile send PM
 
shrdlu Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:15

shrdlu

registered: Feb. 2008
Posts: 143

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
Is this back-and-forth going to continue even though the SWF has been finalised?
Does anyone at all have a good word for the SWF?
Isn't a single(-ish) written form what everyone wanted?
If none of the active writers from any of the current forms decide to support the main form, who's going to produce material for schools?

icon_confused icon_confused icon_confused icon_confused icon_confused icon_confused
Top  Profile send PM
 
Bardh Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:18

Bardh

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 815

Status: offline
last visit: 07.05.08
It all depends on what you mean by 'finalise', 'good', 'active' 'current' and 'material'.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:21

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
pietercharlesThe rumour is that they refused to accept "tth" in the SWF (well, it is used in Kemmyn, after all) because it wasn't attested.
Incorrect. We believed that since geminate consonants in general had been rejected and were no longer a part of the SWF, that keeping this one hold-over in was an oversight or error.
QuoteThen, when someone pointed out that it was used in Tregear, they "discovered" it there.
Incorrect. Either Nicholas or I asked Ben and Albert what their authority for keeping such a geminate was. They said that it was Tregear. So we looked at Tregear.

QuoteThen they "discovered" that this was evidence of geminate "th".
Incorrect. What we discovered was that Tregear regularly aspirates in some positions. His <tth> is actually a way of writing <thh>; that is, he writes an underlying perfeth-ha, gwell-ha, and gwann-ha. These segments were probably subject to a secondary gemination, however.

QuoteThey further "discovered" that "lh" and "nh" were found in Tregear, and went on to "discover" that this was evidence of geminate "l" and geminate "n".
Incorrect. We think it's pretty clear that Tregear was writing aspirates. However, it is not improbable that those segments geminated. Certainly we know some speakers of Revived Tudor Cornish and Revived Late Cornish pronounce <nh> and <lh> as [nh] and [lh] and others pronounce them [n:] and [l:]. We did not "discover" Tregear's <nh> and <lh>. We did, however, notice a pattern that evidently no one had noticed before.

QuoteAnyway, they are now insisting that the SWF allow people to write double "l" as "lh" as well as "ll" and double "n" as "nh" as well as "nn" (e.g. 'tesennow' or 'tesenhow').
Incorrect. We would not suggest that every "double l" or "double n" be written as <lh> or <nh>. The feature is not found in words like tesennow~tesednow. It is only found in words like perfettha, gwelha, gwannha~gwadnha. (Phonetics: [pərˈfɛθhə] > [pərˈfɛθːə], [ˈɡwɛlhə] > [ˈɡwɛlːə], [ˈɡwanhə]~ˈɡwadnhə] > [ˈɡwanːə]~ [ˈɡwatnə]

QuoteI guess George might have come to the same conclusion years ago when he "discovered" "tth", "lh" and "nh", had he believed that we should have umpteen ways of writing the same sound. Thank God he didn't.
We aren't suggesting an umpteenth way of writing "the same sound". We find a linguistic pattern in Tregear. And even if some speakers of Revived Cornish don't make the distinction, others do.

QuoteLet's just hope the saviours of the language don't take another look at Tregear and find that in a couple of instances he wrote "lll" and "nnn" too.
This is dismissive. Whoop-de-doo.

QuoteYou couldn't make it up, could you?? Correction to rumour will arrive any second soon.
Your suppositions were almost all incorrect. Sorry to say so. You were trying to score points.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Eddie-C Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:30

Eddie-C

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 585

Status: offline
last visit: 04.05.08
BardhIt all depends on what you mean by 'finalise', 'good', 'active' 'current' and 'material'.

< Y A W N ! >
I expect it also "depends on what you mean" by such slippery little lexical items as "is", "this", "going" . . .
Alternatively, it could just be that our resident Poetaster is talking his usual line of busel vergh!

Drok drok yu genef rak an sawsnekheans garow-ma.

Fy dhymmo-vy!

icon_smile



edited by: Eddie-C, Mar 17, 2008 - 10:33 PM

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Kernowak y'n Udn Form Screfys?
Hep wow!
Kernewek Acordys? Mar plek!
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:37

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
morvranTregear does use the sequence <tth> a few times (unlike ME,
Give it a rest, Keith.
QuoteI've just run a check) but in no case does it match a geminate consonant. Words include dhedhi 'to her', which has dh, the other side of th phonetically from tth. Another common one is goedh '(be)falls' as in y koedh dhyn "It falls to us", i.e. "we ought". No double 'th' there.
What on earth version of Tregear are you looking at? I have 10 examples of <tth> in Treagear, and the examples you have given do not have <tth> in them. Please cite your examples. I will be happy to cite mine.
QuoteSo it looks like Tregear just doubled the <t> now and again when the mood took him, a common English practise at the time.
I don't think so.

QuoteSo this now shows very clearly the mentality we're up against.
Ad-hominem attack.
Quote<tth> is OK because it happens to turn up in one or two texts in a completely different context. So what's wrong with oe? I can't believe the sequence <oe> doesn't turn up a few times in all the texts, with a different meaning of course, but that no longer seems to matter!
<oe> occurs in the texts in Latin words of course. But why are you worried about it? The SWF uses <oo> for this set of words, which has [o:] in RMC and [u:] in RLC. And Ken George in his own PSRC says that <oo> would be an acceptable graph for this set of words. He suggested <oe> because he preferred the RMC pronunciation and because he thought that people should avoid the RLC pronunciation, but now that the SWF is supposed to embrace both, why should you be grousing about <oe>?
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 Next Page


Users online:
ThingsThatGoFlirInTheShla - Verity - morvran - Allister - srule

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views