search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  SWF, For or against
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 Next Page
Bottom 

SWF, For or against

marhak Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:43

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 2410

Status: offline
last visit: 06.05.08
Yes, the Kesva was set up by the Gorsedd and the FOCS in (I think) 1967, to administer, research and promote the Cornish language. It did so for 20 years. Then, for whatever reason and due to whatever mechanism, it ceased to do so. Instead it promoted only one new version of revived Cornish, paid lip service to the older one, and studiously ignored the existence of RLC and, later UCR, and the research that was done by both.

It lost its original mandate, and did so through its own actions. It was no longer the body for THE CORNISH LANGUAGE - only for one version of it. Which is why other bodies, such as Agan Tavas, Teere ha Tavas and Cussel an Tavas Kernuack, were then set up, to do for their preferred types of Cornish what the Kesva was no longer prepared, or willing, to do.

As a result, the Kesva has no seniority over the others. None whatsoever.



edited by: marhak, Mar 17, 2008 - 09:46 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
pietercharles Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:47



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 156

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
EvertypeYou were trying to score points.


I guess I get no points then, and it's game set and match to you. You're just so good at the game, you always win. It would help if I knew what the rules were, of course.

Anyway, remember I did say it was a rumour. But since I posted it here, I've been sent (by one 'redennek', probably an anonymous Kebmynite) a copy of your paper.

And I'd say that what you've written above is not quite in line with the paper (nor was the rumour, of course). But let others judge - it's only a page long, so perhaps you could post it here?

Oh, and to answer Nosdan's question, it does include pre-occluded 'nh' - 'dnh' - as in 'gwanna', 'gwanha', 'gwadnha'.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Bardh Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:48

Bardh

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 815

Status: offline
last visit: 07.05.08
Evidently, Mick-n-Nick's original statement is no longer operative ...
Top  Profile send PM
 
shrdlu Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:55

shrdlu

registered: Feb. 2008
Posts: 142

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
shrdluIs this back-and-forth going to continue even though the SWF has been finalised?


Apparently. One message for every 7 minutes since I posted that. Good work. icon_rolleyes
Top  Profile send PM
 
Bardh Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:56

Bardh

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 815

Status: offline
last visit: 07.05.08
Evertype These segments were probably subject to a secondary gemination, however.


My Lord, in Commonmoor and Little Petherick they speak of little else ...
Top  Profile send PM
 
Nosdan Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:57

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 949

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
I wonder if this
[quote = Marhak]The late Cecil Roberts of Sennen Cove (who had a lot of traditional Cornish and knew all the coastal names) used to pronounce "Scilly" with two distinct ls, rather like saying "ill-lit" and I wonder if this might be a hangover from the language introducing the second L with a slight "h" sound ("sil-hlee"). Any opinions?[/quote]

and

[quote = Evertype]Incorrect. We would not suggest that every "double l" or "double n" be written as <lh> or <nh>. The feature is not found in words like tesennow~tesednow. It is only found in words like perfettha, gwelha, gwannha~gwadnha. (Phonetics: [pərˈfɛθhə] > [pərˈfɛθːə], [ˈɡwɛlhə] > [ˈɡwɛlːə], [ˈɡwanhə]~ˈɡwadnhə] > [ˈɡwanːə]~ [ˈɡwatnə]
[/quote]

Are connected or its just co-incidence?

Syllhan/sillhy? ~ gwellha?

Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
Bardh Posted: 17.03.2008, 22:58

Bardh

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 815

Status: offline
last visit: 07.05.08
marhakYes, the Kesva was set up by the Gorsedd and the FOCS in (I think) 1967, to administer, research and promote the Cornish language. It did so for 20 years. Then, for whatever reason and due to whatever mechanism, it ceased to do so. Instead it promoted only one new version of revived Cornish, paid lip service to the older one, and studiously ignored the existence of RLC and, later UCR, and the research that was done by both.

It lost its original mandate, and did so through its own actions. It was no longer the body for THE CORNISH LANGUAGE - only for one version of it. Which is why other bodies, such as Agan Tavas, Teere ha Tavas and Cussel an Tavas Kernuack, were then set up, to do for their preferred types of Cornish what the Kesva was no longer prepared, or willing, to do.

As a result, the Kesva has no seniority over the others. None whatsoever.edited by: marhak, Mar 17, 2008 - 09:46 PM


Also sprach Zarathustra ...... or something like that ...
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvran Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:06

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 871

Status: offline
last visit: 09.05.08
Evertype
QuoteAnyway, they are now insisting that the SWF allow people to write double "l" as "lh" as well as "ll" and double "n" as "nh" as well as "nn" (e.g. 'tesennow' or 'tesenhow').
Incorrect. We would not suggest that every "double l" or "double n" be written as <lh> or <nh>. The feature is not found in words like tesennow~tesednow. It is only found in words like perfettha, gwelha, gwannha~gwadnha. (Phonetics: [pərˈfɛθhə] > [pərˈfɛθːə], [ˈɡwɛlhə] > [ˈɡwɛlːə], [ˈɡwanhə]~ˈɡwadnhə] > [ˈɡwanːə]~ [ˈɡwatnə]


Perfyttha etc. might be taken at face value were it not for the many more examples of <tth> written in words where no gemination or aspiration would be expected, like koedh and dhedhi quoted before. Nb. it's important to distinguish gwella 'to get better' (intransitive) from gwell'he 'to make something better' (causitive transitive). As a rule the aspiration is lost unless the syllable is stressed, so gwell + hav 'best' would probably give 'gwella with the usual Cornish double l sound (whatever that was!)

You would need to show a greater than chance occurance of <lh, nh> etc in words with historic /h/ and their absence from a control group of words which never had an /h/. I haven't counted the cases yet, but it looks very much as though the <h> spelling has no bearing on the history of the words, i.e. it's purely orthographic. So we're back to Williams' old game of arguing from selected instances.

EDIT : I'll sort out a list for you tomorrow perhaps. Do you have a photocopy of the Tregear mss? I'm relying on Ray Edwards' reading but he was very thorough and from the samples I've seen it's quite a clear script.

Quote
QuoteYou couldn't make it up, could you?? Correction to rumour will arrive any second soon.
Your suppositions were almost all incorrect. Sorry to say so. You were trying to score points.


And yet again Mr. Neverdone rises to the bait. icon_lol





edited by: morvran, Mar 17, 2008 - 11:15 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:09

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
Yes, Nosdan, Sylhan 'Scilly' is one of those words which RLC speakers (such as Neil Kennedy) have with a geminate.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:13

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
morvranPerfyttha etc. might be taken at face value were it not for the many more examples of <tth> written in words where no gemination or aspiration would be expected, like koedh and dhedhi quoted before.
I count 12 words in the entire corpus with <tth>, 10 of which are in Tregear. You are citing words in Kernowek Kebmyn spelling. Kindly point us to you Tregear citations for "koedh" and "dhedhi".
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
morvran Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:17

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 871

Status: offline
last visit: 09.05.08
Evertype
morvranPerfyttha etc. might be taken at face value were it not for the many more examples of <tth> written in words where no gemination or aspiration would be expected, like koedh and dhedhi quoted before.
I count 12 words in the entire corpus with <tth>, 10 of which are in Tregear. You are citing words in Kernowek Kebmyn spelling. Kindly point us to you Tregear citations for "koedh" and "dhedhi".


See edit to previous post -- Avorrow, avorrow!

Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:23

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
Yes, Keith, I have a copy. I'll type in the words from my version tomorrow too.

We are looking for lh and nh in Tregear also.

PC and I think RD have <tth> both in forms of the verb ladha. I don't think the tth is related to what Tregear was doing. I'd have to have a second look. It's late, and Patrick's Day at that.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:24

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
morvranAnd yet again Mr. Neverdone rises to the bait. icon_lol
Must you be a dick, Keith?
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Evertype Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:28

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
pietercharlesAnd I'd say that what you've written above is not quite in line with the paper (nor was the rumour, of course).
I don't believe my thinking on this issue is incoherent. The document is here. It is not a complete argument. It does not cite all of the examples of the three graphs in Tregear. I would be prepared to make such an argument however.

QuoteOh, and to answer Nosdan's question, it does include pre-occluded 'nh' - 'dnh' - as in 'gwanna', 'gwanha', 'gwadnha'.
<gwadnha> would regularly be pronounced [qwatna].
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
morvran Posted: 17.03.2008, 23:36

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 871

Status: offline
last visit: 09.05.08
marhakYes, the Kesva was set up by the Gorsedd and the FOCS in (I think) 1967, to administer, research and promote the Cornish language. It did so for 20 years. Then, for whatever reason and due to whatever mechanism, it ceased to do so. Instead it promoted only one new version of revived Cornish, paid lip service to the older one, and studiously ignored the existence of RLC and, later UCR, and the research that was done by both.

It lost its original mandate, and did so through its own actions. It was no longer the body for THE CORNISH LANGUAGE - only for one version of it. Which is why other bodies, such as Agan Tavas, Teere ha Tavas and Cussel an Tavas Kernuack, were then set up, to do for their preferred types of Cornish what the Kesva was no longer prepared, or willing, to do.

As a result, the Kesva has no seniority over the others. None whatsoever.


This is a very skewed view of history. Dick Gendall and Co. broke away from the mainstream a few years before Ken published PSRC. Their breakaway had nothing whatever to do with Kemmyn, although after Kemmyn was adopted, at the point where it was still unclear whether or not it would take off, it was the Late crowd who piled in, with criticism in the press etc., trying to take advantage of what they saw as a weakness in the mainstream. Aside from this nastyness, the Late faction have a valid point of view. Just most of us don't think it's workable. And the proof is in the outcome. Very few people have supported Late over the years and hardly anyone who started by learning Late has reached fluency. Neil is on record about this. I think there may be a fair few beginners and 'Good Intentions' types attracted to Late, but they never get very far with it. Either they drop out or they change to another variety. Dick's 'rebellion' was supposed to be due to a row he had with the Kesva (probably when most of the Old Guard were still running things) over reprinting Kernewek Bew. Larry knew all about this, more than he was prepared to tell in fact.

The AT hijack has already been described in glorious technicolor so I don't need to repeat that again -- ask Pawl when he's back, he's an eyewitness. AT publishes very little and has never even offered to take over the UC exams, or develop its own for UCR. I rather doubt if the language would get very far if it had to rely on AT's efforts. One or two individuals do good work, I'm sure, but it really is one or two.

These two splinterettes have largely survived because of outside backing. Why should anyone back them? As a way to weaken and destabelise the Revival as a whole. When will Marghek etc. wake up to the fact that they're being used?
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 Next Page


Users online:
Abieuan - gravydave - fwltur - Palores - Coady - P_Trembath - portbyhan - Allister

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views