search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  SWF, For or against
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 Next Page
Bottom 

SWF, For or against

morvran Posted: 18.03.2008, 00:00

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 881

Status: offline
last visit: 12.05.08
Lets answer something interesting ... icon_smile

marhakThe late Cecil Roberts of Sennen Cove (who had a lot of traditional Cornish and knew all the coastal names) used to pronounce "Scilly" with two distinct ls, rather like saying "ill-lit" and I wonder if this might be a hangover from the language introducing the second L with a slight "h" sound ("sil-hlee"). Any opinions?


I've heard it said that some people have a particular way of saying the name "Pengelly", but this is one for the dialect and place-name experts.

QuoteIt was Cecil who gave us the Cornish word for lighthouse - not "golowjy" (which was made up by Nance), but "golowty" - the ancient "t" retained much like "lety". You would think that the stress would be on the second syllable but apparently, in this case, it's on the first one, with the "-ow-" reduced to schwa. This was confirmed in 1964 when the Tater-du lighthouse was being built and an old local man was heard to ask the builders if they were building as "new gol'ty". I believe that the Welsh word is "goleity".


The Welsh is goleu-dy which would sound like "go-LOY-dee" [go'l@1d1]. I heard a local Cornish person say the dialect word on the radio a little while ago, and it sounded to me very like the Welsh word, so I wonder if somehow someone who'd lived in Wales had brought the word back with them -- not impossible. I wonder if it's used in Welsh English?

Letti 'dairy' is from leth + ti 'milk' + 'house'. The combination of th+t regularly give a double tt and this will have been quite an old compound so -ti rather than chi ~ ji. For 'lighthouse' I'd expect go'low-di if the compound was old, but golow-ji perhaps with the last bit stressed (???) if it's relatively modern. There's no reason to have a t in there that I can see. Of course the word might well have morphed once it passed into dialect, including the stress shifting.

However I'll bow before the wisdom of the dialect and placename experts, they must have gone into this, surely?
Top  Profile send PM
 
Bardh Posted: 18.03.2008, 00:34

Bardh

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 815

Status: offline
last visit: 07.05.08
There's a song with the refrain Ceidwad y goleudy ydwyf i...

Unlike twp, bach, cariad, bara brith ... it's not used in the Welsh version of English, as far as I know. The word Craig transcribes as 'gol'ty' doesn't look a particularly strong candidate for being a cognate. The jury's not even gone out on this one.
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvran Posted: 18.03.2008, 02:58

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 881

Status: offline
last visit: 12.05.08
Perhaps it was g'lodi or g'loji?

QuoteCeidwad y goleudy ydwyf i...


Wel, dyna swydd iawn i rywun, ond oes??

Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 18.03.2008, 08:10

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 2411

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
Yes, "goleudy" is the Welsh word. My mistake. Is the compound old or not? Hard to say. I don't think any Cornish or Scillonian lighthouse pre-dates 1600; however, there were navigational beacons on medieval chapels 300 years earlier - Chapel Carn Brea and Chapel Jane being two known examples (I'll bet that St Nicholas's Chapel, right on top of The Island, St Ives, was another). There's no record as to whether the word was ever applied to them, though. Nor does it appear in any known place-name.

I think, on the balance of evidence, that the scales might tip in favour of "golowty".

Having mentioned the word "Scillonian", future dictionaries need to include the Cornish word for "a Scillonian (person)". You'll find this in Charles Thomas's superb book on the submergence of Scilly: "Explorations of a Drowned Landscape" (Batsford 1985). You'll find it on Page 62, where Prof. Thomas says:

"The Borough Accounts of St Ives for 1523 include a man described as 'John Thomas, Sullouk'; and this word could represent a *Sillewek, *Sullewek, formed by imitating the better-known word *Kernewek.". (We already know that Scilly in Cornish is recorded as "Sillan, Zillan, Syllan" - not Enesow Syllan, just Syllan, by the way).

I dare say that we could slightly respell this as *Syllowek.



edited by: marhak, Mar 18, 2008 - 07:19 AM
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 18.03.2008, 08:35

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 2411

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
I think that, back in the 80s, the Kesva made a fundamental mistake. Instead of saying, "Look, we're embracing Kemmyn, but we will also take the other versions on board with us", they turned their backs on the other forms. Whatever the accusations and counter-accusations of deep skullduggery, it was this that, more than anything, created the split. Had the Kesva agreed to embrace all current forms, it would have remained fully united (unified?), retained its original mandate,and kept the factional nastiness to an absolute minimum or even avoided it altogether. It's a mistake that can now be rectified - if the Kesva has the will to do so.

Keith, ole pard, why now claim that AT and the RLC groups had "outside backing"? It's not correct and unecessary. If this was really true, something would have been said long before now. It ain't so. No one ever accused any of our members (or RLC users) of being former members of English nationalist movements, have they?



edited by: marhak, Mar 18, 2008 - 07:36 AM
Top  Profile send PM
 
pietercharles Posted: 18.03.2008, 08:41



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 161

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
EvertypeThe document is here.


There you go, Nosdan. All the information you need.

Evertype, it would be good if you could post links to the other papers as well, before some disenchanted Kebmynite like 'redennek' sends them to me anyway.

There is something I don't understand about the paper (remember, a gowetha, I'm not a linguist so I have no qualms, as some do, about owning up to ignorance). It's this -

Williams and Everson appear to have "discovered" something we all knew already. That superlative adjectives have geminate consonants in them. We write 'kottha' and 'gwettha' and 'perfeyttha' and 'gwanna' and 'pella' already, so what's new?

I'm a little suspicious of the sentence in the paper that says 'tth' now meets with approval "because it is clear that there is a linguistic development here not just a theoretical construct".

So a little further explanation for the man on the Redruth omnibus wouldn't go amiss.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Nosdan Posted: 18.03.2008, 09:17

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
Its an interesting idea, I would be interested if you could tell me is this a regular development through tregear... does it happen in all superlatives or just a select few?

Also if this is a newly discovered thing, why did some users already aspirate?

And is there any evidence of this aspiration in the other late fragments?

Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
Evertype Posted: 18.03.2008, 13:17

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
pietercharlesEvertype, it would be good if you could post links to the other papers as well, before some disenchanted Kebmynite like 'redennek' sends them to me anyway.
All seven of them are available in a single link toward the bottom of the page at kernowak.com.

QuoteWilliams and Everson appear to have "discovered" something we all knew already. That superlative adjectives have geminate consonants in them. We write 'kottha' and 'gwettha' and 'perfeyttha' and 'gwanna' and 'pella' already, so what's new?
The development here shows aspiration. The aspirate consonants may have geminated, but the aspirated pronunciation is legitimate and it should be permitted to write it.

QuoteI'm a little suspicious of the sentence in the paper that says 'tth' now meets with approval "because it is clear that there is a linguistic development here not just a theoretical construct".
We do not approve of <tth> alone. It is part of a set with <lh> and <nh>.



edited by: Evertype, Mar 18, 2008 - 01:18 PM
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Evertype Posted: 18.03.2008, 13:17

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
duplicate



edited by: Evertype, Mar 18, 2008 - 01:19 PM
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Evertype Posted: 18.03.2008, 13:24

Evertype

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
NosdanAlso if this is a newly discovered thing, why did some users already aspirate?
<lh> and <nh> were known as aspirates/geminates. We (for our part) had not recognized Tregear's <tth> as an aspirate [θh] however.

QuoteAnd is there any evidence of this aspiration in the other late fragments?
<lh> and <nh> are fairly common, yes.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Nosdan Posted: 18.03.2008, 14:29

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
QuoteRe: SWF, Jenefer should be circulating the result tomorrow. Then we'll see whether it's workable or not.


so spoke marhak yesterday... Has anyone received anything? Maga's still devoid of information... I would appreciate a gander if someone has a copy?

Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
pietercharles Posted: 18.03.2008, 14:40



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 161

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
I doubt very, very, much if he meant Jenefer would be circulating the result to everyone (i.e. making it public) today. I'll be stunned into silence (which might please many of you) if he did and she does.
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvran Posted: 18.03.2008, 15:36

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 881

Status: offline
last visit: 12.05.08
Evertype
NosdanAlso if this is a newly discovered thing, why did some users already aspirate?
<lh> and <nh> were known as aspirates/geminates. We (for our part) had not recognized Tregear's <tth> as an aspirate [θh] however.


While a distinction of duration between [T] and [TT] (or [T:] if you prefer) is perfectly possible, I can't see you could have *[Th] or *[TTh] since at the purely articulatory level the hiss of the [T] would drown out any superimposed aspiration. I cannot recall ever seeing a language which made this distinction, do you know of one Michael? That does not rule out the possibility that [T:] might be represented phonemically as /Th/ if for some reason that made systematic sense. But then all phonologies are theoretical, just ways of accounting for the observed phonetic facts.





edited by: morvran, Mar 18, 2008 - 03:38 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
Nosdan Posted: 18.03.2008, 15:38

Nosdan

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 956

Status: offline
last visit: 11.05.08
Ah... thought as much, no swf yet then.... Another several months then.

icon_frown

Mar vedhow avel gelvinek
(as maazed as a curlew)
Top  Profile send PM
 
Palores Posted: 18.03.2008, 15:41



registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 225

Status: offline
last visit: 10.05.08
EvertypeThe SWF uses <oo> for this set of words, which has [o:] in RMC and [u:] in RLC.

This is a most unfortunate choice. <oo> is a manifestly English spelling that sits uneasily with the rest of the orthography. We have all seen that it leads to risible spellings like poos and loos. But the worst aspect is that it will be nearly impossible to persuade English speakers that <oo> should be pronounced [o:].
EvertypeAnd Ken George in his own PSRC says that <oo> would be an acceptable graph for this set of words.

It is advisable to check everything that Evertype writes. I have checked my copy of PSRC. It says that <oo> was "considered but dismissed"; although "historically correct [i.e. it was used in Late Cornish vernacular spelling], it suggests [u:] rather than [o:]". Nowhere does it say that <oo> would be an acceptable graph.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 Next Page


Users online:
Allister - srule

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views