search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  Kernewek Mashup
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page
Bottom 

Kernewek Mashup

Cawsando Posted: 10.03.2008, 18:31

Cawsando

registered: Feb. 2007
Posts: 477

Status: online
As for Mike's point, we also have three indiginous sports, Gigs, Hurling and wrestling.

What are the names of these sports in SWF?

We also have a plethora of unique festivals, and a written heritage, so we do have a recognisable culture.

KERNOW DOES'NT BOW TO LONDON
Top  Profile send PM
 
pdunbar Posted: 10.03.2008, 19:09



registered: Sep. 2007
Posts: 245

Status: offline
last visit: 28.04.08
Cawsando Hence the importance of all speakers pledging alliance to the SWF.


Even if it is a linguistically unsound, unworkable mess, with serious and unnecessary inbuilt problems which would make teaching and learning it difficult, including an inability of the ad-hoc group to agree on basic pronunciation?

We need the best available spelling to go into schools if we want kids to learn it.

The Partnership will have to have a serious rethink.

- Pawl
Top  Profile send PM
 
Palores Posted: 10.03.2008, 19:13



registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 279

Status: online
Cawsando The point is, damage continues to be dealt to the repuation and authenticity of the language worldwide whilst it is fractured.

Hence the importance of all speakers pledging alliance to the SWF.


The reputation of the language does not depend on whether the movement is fractured or not. It depends on how academically defensible the revived language is. That is why so much effort has been put into getting Kernewek Kemmyn as accurate as possible. I for one cannot pledge allegiance (and certainly not "alliance" ) to an inferior product.
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 10.03.2008, 21:52

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 3208

Status: online
If you can't pledge allegiance to an inferior product, why support Kemmyn? Its flaws, based upon a mistaken phonology and faulty database, are well known but have never been addressed (at least since the initial tj/dj disaster.

Do you know what KG has said now? That final -y should not be accepted into the SWF because Welsh and Breton both have final -i. No matter that final -y is attested roughly 100 times more than -i in Cornish texts.

I have news for him. Cornish is not Welsh. Cornish is not Breton. It is Cornish. And Cornish has -y. Nor should Cornish be made to become like Breton or Welsh. It is distinct from both and should remain distinct. Cornish developed assibilation. Welsh and Breton did not. Are we then, by the same argument, to say that "wood" should now be spelt "coet"? And kick 800 years of history and NATURAL (not one man's late 20th century theoretical) development into touch?

No, we should not. But if we are to accept final -i because Welsh and Breton are to provde the model (according to KG), then assibilation will have to go too. Totally unacceptable.



edited by: marhak, Mar 10, 2008 - 08:54 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
morvran Posted: 10.03.2008, 22:58

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 1293

Status: offline
last visit: 05.09.08
Sorry Marghek, "i" and "y" represent two quite different sounds in KK. The weren't distinguished very well in the texts because they hardly ever wrote "i" and when they did it was interchangable with "y". The "y" sound is only found at the end of a handful of words, like "my" and "ty", everywhere else (always when unstressed) final "y" changed to "e" and then to "a", so almost all the "y"'s at the end of words in the old texts represent the "i"-sound. So we spell them with "i". There's a reason for everything.

You I think, see yourself as a Cornish patriot, yet you want to spell the language with a ill-fitting bodged second-hand English system. We can do a bit better. The Bretons for example no longer write Breton in French spelling, "quet" for "ket" and "eux" for "eus" etc. Yet that's how Breton was spelled at the time our texts were written. Why is it OK for them to have a first-class system that fits their language, but we're supposed to use a second-class system that doesn't?

Again, the problem is caused because the language went out of use, so people can't distinguish between Cornish words and names that have passed into English (including Cornish dialect English) and been transformed in the process, and the Cornish language itself.

The whole point of Cornish, it's central significance to Cornish separateness, it that it is a whole separate language in it's own right. It's not a "dialect", not funny "naughty English". It's a different language. The place names sound different in Cornish. Just as Welsh or Gaelic names have different versions from those used in English. Same with Breton and French, or Basque and French/Spanish, or anywhere else in the world that's bilingual.

Cornish is a different language from English. Dressing it up as "funny English" does no-one a service.
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 10.03.2008, 23:14

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1635

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
How come it is ok for NJW to refer to Breton and Welsh in his analysis of Cornish, but not ok for Ken George to do the same??

Blog Gokypyth yw 'Agan Tavas"?, Agan Tavas yw Eddie Climo.
Agan Taves Nowyth
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
pietercharles Posted: 11.03.2008, 08:27



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 500

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
marhak, why do you do this? Why do you pronounce on matters when you clearly haven't taken any time to understand them?

Like you, I'm not a linguist. But it turns out that linguistics is really not that difficult to understand, so you could at least make an effort.

If you did, you would be able to make a fairly sensible judgement about '-i' and '-y' and understand why Kemmyn is the way it is, even if you didn't like it - and you surely wouldn't.

It would also allow you to see that there is absolutely no parallel whatsoever between the '-i' / '-y' choice and assibilation, and that there is not a universal rule in Kemmyn that says 'do it the way it's done in Welsh and Breton'.

It is very difficult not to believe that you are being fed these peculiar notions by someone that does understand the issues and who is egging you on to wind everybody up so that they assume entrenched positions. Whether that's true, or you are single-handedly coming up with this tosh, it is, to quote your very self, "totally unacceptable".

But we'll no doubt have to put up with more of it as this nightmare rolls on.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Palores Posted: 11.03.2008, 10:54



registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 279

Status: online
Marhak why support Kemmyn? Its flaws, based upon a mistaken phonology and faulty database, are well known but have never been addressed (at least since the initial tj/dj disaster)


Marhak has been misled here by propaganda.
Kernewek Kemmyn is not based upon a database, faulty or otherwise.
He may not appreciate that every criticism of KK is taken seriously, and examined carefully.
It is important to the developers (plural) of KK that it be the best orthography available.
So if any criticisms are found to be substantiated, then steps are taken to correct errors.
These usually concern the misspelling of a few individual words.
Occasionally structural faults come to light and these are also corrected.
As a (now rather old) example, Marhak mentioned the matter of tj/dj.
More recently, Keith Bailey drew attention to the existence of the /yw/ phoneme.
I understand that the Language Board recently agreed that words containing it be spelled with <uw>.
Williams has identified what he claims are other structural faults.
These claims of alleged flaws have similarly been scrutinised. None has been found to be valid. The phonology is not mistaken.
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 11.03.2008, 11:54

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1635

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
QuoteI have news for him. Cornish is not Welsh. Cornish is not Breton

Modern Standard Cornish is not English either or the Cornglish of Treagar,or certain other forms of revived Cornish.


Blog Gokypyth yw 'Agan Tavas"?, Agan Tavas yw Eddie Climo.
Agan Taves Nowyth
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
pdunbar Posted: 11.03.2008, 14:58



registered: Sep. 2007
Posts: 245

Status: offline
last visit: 28.04.08
And anyway, surely you meant 'lashup'?

Or do you have a lisp?

- Pawl
Top  Profile send PM
 
Fulub-le-Breton Posted: 12.03.2008, 17:26

Fulub-le-Breton

registered: Sep. 2004
Posts: 4365

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
Mike
Fulub-le-Breton
QuoteFulub, as the Cornish Democrat, shouldn't you support.....


blah blah blah..... Really don't get it do you?
edited by: Fulub-le-Breton, Mar 10, 2008 - 06:41 PM


The Kernewek language is the only real thing that sets Cornwall apart from other parts of the UK and so is pretty fundamental to any Cornish cause. I would find it incredibly easy to argue that other topics are not too dissimilar in Cornwall, especially many that you discuss Fulub.

As a consequence the language is very important and the experts should be allowed to discuss it freely. That everyone can defend their point is democracy. Otherwise we will end up with a meaningless hybrid and be subject to ridicule. The form of language chosen should be self-consistent and not a mixture. If this is achieved, it does not matter what 'mudhook' and the like think as the expertise is above them.


Yes the 'experts' should be allowed to discuss it freely but what they should refrain from doing is having childish slanging matches on a public internet forum which just make everyone look silly.

As for Pawls remarks about my views on democracy and majority rule. Pawl surely a democracy must listen to and protect its minorities as well?

You know with the Celtic Devonshire / Devonwall movement being so quiet at the momment I wonder if they haven't actually invested the Cornish language scene in order to cause disent and disagreement.

The Cornish Democrat
The Breton Connection
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Mike Posted: 12.03.2008, 17:49

Mike

registered: Jul. 2004
Posts: 2537

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
QuoteYou know with the Celtic Devonshire / Devonwall movement being so quiet at the momment I wonder if they haven't actually invested the Cornish language scene in order to cause disent and disagreement.


No, they were just beaten by the arguments. To continue would have made them look sillier and sillier.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Mike Posted: 12.03.2008, 18:46

Mike

registered: Jul. 2004
Posts: 2537

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
There's been no response from AT on the i and y controversy talked about in this thread!
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
morvran Posted: 12.03.2008, 20:30

morvran

registered: Mar. 2007
Posts: 1293

Status: offline
last visit: 05.09.08
When you come up with a good answer, they never admit defeat. The just go quiet for a while, then start up again as if nothing had happened. The temptation is to begin explaining whatever it was all over again. But it's pointless really, as much use as talking to a brick wall.

The other day I found a list of their claims from a couple of years ago. Most of them have been refuted several times over but they're still coming out with them. You know, "rigged meeting", "faulty secret database", "magic algorithym", "one man & a computer", "not qualified", "Kesva strong-arm tactics", "all just theory", "sustained criticism", "no academic support", "we're all arrogant", "nobody uses it anyway (unless they've been forced to)", "copied from Breton (or Welsh)", "trad. texts not written like English", on and on, and the same for a whole list of technical linguistic points which I won't bore you with here.

All bullshite, but they won't be told. I'm fed up of refuting all this over and over, I need to spend more time with my language icon_wink

Don't believe a word of it -- "Empty vessels make most sound".
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 12.03.2008, 20:45

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1635

Status: offline
last visit: 07.10.08
Quote-- "Empty vessels make most sound".

That explains Eddie.

Blog Gokypyth yw 'Agan Tavas"?, Agan Tavas yw Eddie Climo.
Agan Taves Nowyth
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 Next Page


Users online:
TeamKernow - marhak - Palores - Cawsando - srule - pennysquire

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views