search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  The Rest of the World ::  WWIII inevitable?
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 Next Page
Bottom 

WWIII inevitable?

ilovehelston Posted: 14.09.2008, 14:40



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
Griffin
QuoteThe fact is he still won a second term in (reasonably) free and fair elections/   
wow? are you seriously swallowing that crap?

next you'll be saying that China is a democracy...



Um, yeah, Goergia did have free and fair elections
Top  Profile send PM
 
Griffin Posted: 14.09.2008, 14:51



registered: Jul. 2008
Posts: 356

Status: offline
last visit: 23.11.08
Call me a left-wing hippie if you will, but I prefer my elections to not be rigged....

'Griffin Girl'[?]
"Cornish will take over your life. it does. Resistance is futile."
Click for shameless self promotion.
And here
 
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
ilovehelston Posted: 14.09.2008, 15:27



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
How was Georgua's elections rigged?
Top  Profile send PM
 
DTresaw Posted: 25.09.2008, 12:42



registered: Jul. 2008
Posts: 34

Status: offline
last visit: 03.10.08
cornishrebel2The only reason the us is sticking up for Georgia is that they want them to join NATO so the yanks can have there bases there to launch a quick attack on Russia if it kicks off I don't blame Russia ether for being pissed off the us is always poking its nose where it is not wanted. Just like the english they are war mongers


The Russkies are hardly shy of starting a barney are they.
Top  Profile send PM
 
cornishrebel2 Posted: 26.09.2008, 00:42

cornishrebel2

registered: Feb. 2008
Posts: 115

Status: offline
last visit: 09.10.08
Yeah true they have started a few wars in there time but they didnt start this one like ilh has been trying to say

What does it mean to be English?
Being English is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer then travelling home grabbing an Indian curry or a Chinese on the way to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American soap shows on a Japane
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 27.09.2008, 19:44



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
DTresaw
cornishrebel2The only reason the us is sticking up for Georgia is that they want them to join NATO so the yanks can have there bases there to launch a quick attack on Russia if it kicks off I don't blame Russia ether for being pissed off the us is always poking its nose where it is not wanted. Just like the english they are war mongers


The Russkies are hardly shy of starting a barney are they.


Correct, they are a serious and grave threat to Europe
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 27.09.2008, 19:45



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
cornishrebel2Yeah true they have started a few wars in there time but they didnt start this one like ilh has been trying to say



They way over-reacted and Russian troops are now in Georgian territory. Still! this is a disgusting assault on our friend, Georgia!
Top  Profile send PM
 
cornishrebel2 Posted: 27.09.2008, 23:50

cornishrebel2

registered: Feb. 2008
Posts: 115

Status: offline
last visit: 09.10.08
I have found this for you read ilh
Russia
Moscow defends Georgia action

Russia’s deputy prime minister has defended his country’s military actions in Georgia. Interviewed by euronews in Moscow, Sergei Ivanov expressed surprise at the international condemnation that followed and said Moscow had no choice but to respond to Georgia’s attempt to regain control of the breakaway region of South Ossetia.

euronews:

Mr Deputy Prime Minister, what’s your view of what has happened in the past few days?

Sergei Ivanov:

“It was an attempt to destroy the Ossetian people, to push them out of the territory of South Ossetia. That – as Mr Saakashvili and probably some of his Western sponsors believed – would solve the problem with the separatist region. And according to the documentary proof we’re now seeing, they planned, after that, to conduct the same operation in Abkhazia. That’s what has happened. Genocide is what has happened, widespread physical destruction with artillery shells, tanks and guns, of thousands of Russian citizens. Basically, an ethnic cleansing operation was carried out.”

euronews:

If Russia had evidence of genocide in South Ossetia – why didn’t it present that evidence to the UN Security Council and get UN backing for the use of force?”

Sergei Ivanov

“For several days the Russian Federation was conducting a military operation of peace enforcement. That operation is now concluded successfully. By that I mean that Georgia is now no longer capable of repeating its military offensive in South Ossetia or Abkhasia. And only now, when the operation has been completed and its goals achieved, can Russian criminal investigators and other law-enforcement officials work in the field to collect evidence which will then be presented to the international community along with corresponding accusations against the Georgian leadership.”

euronews:

“The situation in South Ossetia has been building for a long time. Was the Russian military operation prepared in advance, or was this operation started only after the reports came in of Russian civilians and Russian peacekeepers being killed?”

Sergei Ivanov

“Let’s be rational. If the Russian Federation had known in advance, as you say, that Saakashvili had such insane plans – then, of course, we would have acted accordingly and would at least have put our military forces directly along the border between Russia and South Ossetia and by the Rockskiy tunnel (between North and South Ossetia). In that case, we could have responded within a couple of hours. But, naturally, that didn’t happen, because we couldn’t know about Saakashvili’s plans. Of course, we needed some time – about a day – to send our troops to South Ossetia to protect our citizens and peacekeepers. And in that time, Georgian troops shelled a city without being challenged, they fired on it with tanks and artillery, they crushed children under tank tracks, they burned women who were locked in sheds – all in all, they conducted genocide and ethnic cleansing.”

euronews:

“Georgia claims it was defending itself, and says its troops didn’t target civilians in Tshinvali.”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Defending itself from what? From the Ossetian people? At the moment when Georgia unleashed its military action in the conflict zone, there were about three hundred and fifty Russian peacekeepers, armed only with machine guns, since no other weapons were allowed according to the (ceasefire) agreement (then in place between Russia and Georgia for South Ossetia). There were no ‘Grads’ (multiple rocket launchers) and no tanks there. It was peacekeepers and local civilians. And a very small force, dwarfed by the Georgian army, the military forces of South Ossetia. The number of soldiers was completely mismatched. So who was it Georgia was defending itself against? It wasn’t defending, it was attacking. And only after we sent our additional troops to reinforce the peacekeeping contingent and to start a peace-enforcing operation – only then did Saakashvili cry out hysterically that Russia was attacking him.”

euronews:

“What was the point of your strikes against targets outside the conflict zone – targets in Georgian territory, including civilian targets, according to eyewitnesses?”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Eye witnesses? I think it’s more something that President Saakashvili’s has said. I wouldn’t trust such eyewitnesses too much, as many of them resemble too much Goebbels’ propaganda, trying to present white as black and vice versa, trying to present a victim of an aggression as the initiator of the aggression, and vice versa. Our ground forces never crossed the border of the conflict zone – instead they launched strikes in response to the Georgian forces attacks, such as artillery, which were still targeting Tskhinvali. There was speculation, panicky rumours and disinformation – that Russian tanks had allegedly entered Gori; stories of Russian planes bombing Tbilisi. They were all Goebbels style lies invented by the Georgian leadership.”

euronews:

“Why do you think not a single country, except Cuba, supported the Russian military action?”

Sergei Ivanov

“In short, it’s maybe simply because of double standards. You see, Russia didn’t really have a choice after what the Georgian leadership did. Large numbers of our citizens were wiped out, and no one can disprove that, it’s a fact.”

euronews:

“In conclusion – how solid do you think the ceasefire is that is now been established between Russia and Georgia?”

Sergei Ivanov:

“I hope it will hold. I hope this time the Georgian leadership will have enough sense not to repeat the adventures it has pursued lately. I hope very much that the ceasefire will hold firm, but I’ll repeat: to ensure the ceasefire lasts we will take all necessary action for the security of our Russian citizens living in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.”

euronews:

“What action precisely? Will the Russian army stay in those internationally unrecognised republics?”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Not the Russian army, but peacekeeping forces, deployed there legitimately. You have to agree there’s a big difference, and the difference is fundamental.”

euronews:

“Georgia says they are ‘occupying’ forces.”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Well, Georgia can call them whatever it wants, it won’t change the reality.”

It is Georgia who are in the wrong they started the war not Russia

How are Russia a threat to Europe? Russia dont have plans to invade Eroupe as far as I know they just keep them selfs to them selfs they aint trying to take over or rule the world like the U.S.

Dont know what drugs you have been smoking but ya wana leave of them cos they aint doing you any good

What does it mean to be English?
Being English is about driving in a German car to an Irish pub for a Belgian beer then travelling home grabbing an Indian curry or a Chinese on the way to sit on Swedish furniture and watch American soap shows on a Japane
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 28.09.2008, 10:24



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
cornishrebel2I have found this for you read ilh
Russia
Moscow defends Georgia action

Russia’s deputy prime minister has defended his country’s military actions in Georgia. Interviewed by euronews in Moscow, Sergei Ivanov expressed surprise at the international condemnation that followed and said Moscow had no choice but to respond to Georgia’s attempt to regain control of the breakaway region of South Ossetia.

euronews:

Mr Deputy Prime Minister, what’s your view of what has happened in the past few days?

Sergei Ivanov:

“It was an attempt to destroy the Ossetian people, to push them out of the territory of South Ossetia. That – as Mr Saakashvili and probably some of his Western sponsors believed – would solve the problem with the separatist region. And according to the documentary proof we’re now seeing, they planned, after that, to conduct the same operation in Abkhazia. That’s what has happened. Genocide is what has happened, widespread physical destruction with artillery shells, tanks and guns, of thousands of Russian citizens. Basically, an ethnic cleansing operation was carried out.”

euronews:

If Russia had evidence of genocide in South Ossetia – why didn’t it present that evidence to the UN Security Council and get UN backing for the use of force?”

Sergei Ivanov

“For several days the Russian Federation was conducting a military operation of peace enforcement. That operation is now concluded successfully. By that I mean that Georgia is now no longer capable of repeating its military offensive in South Ossetia or Abkhasia. And only now, when the operation has been completed and its goals achieved, can Russian criminal investigators and other law-enforcement officials work in the field to collect evidence which will then be presented to the international community along with corresponding accusations against the Georgian leadership.”

euronews:

“The situation in South Ossetia has been building for a long time. Was the Russian military operation prepared in advance, or was this operation started only after the reports came in of Russian civilians and Russian peacekeepers being killed?”

Sergei Ivanov

“Let’s be rational. If the Russian Federation had known in advance, as you say, that Saakashvili had such insane plans – then, of course, we would have acted accordingly and would at least have put our military forces directly along the border between Russia and South Ossetia and by the Rockskiy tunnel (between North and South Ossetia). In that case, we could have responded within a couple of hours. But, naturally, that didn’t happen, because we couldn’t know about Saakashvili’s plans. Of course, we needed some time – about a day – to send our troops to South Ossetia to protect our citizens and peacekeepers. And in that time, Georgian troops shelled a city without being challenged, they fired on it with tanks and artillery, they crushed children under tank tracks, they burned women who were locked in sheds – all in all, they conducted genocide and ethnic cleansing.”

euronews:

“Georgia claims it was defending itself, and says its troops didn’t target civilians in Tshinvali.”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Defending itself from what? From the Ossetian people? At the moment when Georgia unleashed its military action in the conflict zone, there were about three hundred and fifty Russian peacekeepers, armed only with machine guns, since no other weapons were allowed according to the (ceasefire) agreement (then in place between Russia and Georgia for South Ossetia). There were no ‘Grads’ (multiple rocket launchers) and no tanks there. It was peacekeepers and local civilians. And a very small force, dwarfed by the Georgian army, the military forces of South Ossetia. The number of soldiers was completely mismatched. So who was it Georgia was defending itself against? It wasn’t defending, it was attacking. And only after we sent our additional troops to reinforce the peacekeeping contingent and to start a peace-enforcing operation – only then did Saakashvili cry out hysterically that Russia was attacking him.”

euronews:

“What was the point of your strikes against targets outside the conflict zone – targets in Georgian territory, including civilian targets, according to eyewitnesses?”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Eye witnesses? I think it’s more something that President Saakashvili’s has said. I wouldn’t trust such eyewitnesses too much, as many of them resemble too much Goebbels’ propaganda, trying to present white as black and vice versa, trying to present a victim of an aggression as the initiator of the aggression, and vice versa. Our ground forces never crossed the border of the conflict zone – instead they launched strikes in response to the Georgian forces attacks, such as artillery, which were still targeting Tskhinvali. There was speculation, panicky rumours and disinformation – that Russian tanks had allegedly entered Gori; stories of Russian planes bombing Tbilisi. They were all Goebbels style lies invented by the Georgian leadership.”

euronews:

“Why do you think not a single country, except Cuba, supported the Russian military action?”

Sergei Ivanov

“In short, it’s maybe simply because of double standards. You see, Russia didn’t really have a choice after what the Georgian leadership did. Large numbers of our citizens were wiped out, and no one can disprove that, it’s a fact.”

euronews:

“In conclusion – how solid do you think the ceasefire is that is now been established between Russia and Georgia?”

Sergei Ivanov:

“I hope it will hold. I hope this time the Georgian leadership will have enough sense not to repeat the adventures it has pursued lately. I hope very much that the ceasefire will hold firm, but I’ll repeat: to ensure the ceasefire lasts we will take all necessary action for the security of our Russian citizens living in South Ossetia and Abkhazia.”

euronews:

“What action precisely? Will the Russian army stay in those internationally unrecognised republics?”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Not the Russian army, but peacekeeping forces, deployed there legitimately. You have to agree there’s a big difference, and the difference is fundamental.”

euronews:

“Georgia says they are ‘occupying’ forces.”

Sergei Ivanov:

“Well, Georgia can call them whatever it wants, it won’t change the reality.”

It is Georgia who are in the wrong they started the war not Russia

How are Russia a threat to Europe? Russia dont have plans to invade Eroupe as far as I know they just keep them selfs to them selfs they aint trying to take over or rule the world like the U.S.

Dont know what drugs you have been smoking but ya wana leave of them cos they aint doing you any good



How is USA trying to take over the world? Georgia is in Europe, Russia has invaded a fellow European country. And they want to extend their influence over Europe
Top  Profile send PM
 
Taran Posted: 28.09.2008, 21:21

Taran

registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 316

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
ILH, you are an exceedingly stupid person. Your pathetic posts prove you don't read properly, and your pointless, blue rinse, fascist ideas are the preserve of pond life. You have the grasp of international relations that I would expect of a three year old.

Everything has been explained and explained, yet like some kind of stupid goldfish circling their fish bowl you simply return to trotting out the same pathetic, idiot one line questions again and again. You never manage to answer a question yourself, obviously you can't!

Iraq is in the middle east, US and Britain have invaded Iraq, with no provocation, or have you forgotten that. Russia was responding to a Georgian attack on civilians and its legitimate peacekeeping forces, there with Georgian agreement since 1991.

Russia was allowed to have its troops in Georgia, but I've already explained all that a long time ago, your goldfish intellect has obviously forgotten, mind you that would presuppose you had read my posts, which from your infantile bleatings it is obvious you didn't!

What are you trying to prove or show, other than your own inadequacy?



edited by: Taran, Sep 28, 2008 - 09:23 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 28.09.2008, 22:11



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08


Russia was allowed to have its troops in Georgia, but I've already explained all that a long time ago, your goldfish intellect has obviously forgotten, mind you that would presuppose you had read my posts, which from your infantile bleatings it is obvious you didn't!

What are you trying to prove or show, other than your own inadequacy?edited by: Taran, Sep 28, 2008 - 09:23 PM [/quote]

Thanks for the personal abuse. Why not relate to the posts?

If you want questions asked, ask them!

You are correct that there was no provocation in invasion of iraq. Georgia did not pose a direct treat to Russia, either, so Russia and USA are equally at fault, except that Russia is more to blame as it is more destabiling to the Caucasues region.

USA and Britain are in Iraq due to a UN resolution. The UN approved it!
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 28.09.2008, 22:11



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
So would you say that USA should be in IRaq seeing as that has a UN mandate?
Top  Profile send PM
 
Taran Posted: 29.09.2008, 09:30

Taran

registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 316

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
QuoteSo would you say that USA should be in IRaq seeing as that has a UN mandate?

Only after the invasion and occupation. To pull out would have been to create a power vacuum and certain civil war. The crime is not in staying, although this is undoubtedly fuel to the fire, the troops there should be UN, but in the initial military action.

That aside, what do you think should happen when a civilian city comes under assault by artillery and rockets, regardless of where or when this occurs.

Secondly, should the peace keepers standby as they are also targeted or should they intervene? Bearing in mind their remit is to prevent military action of this type.
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 29.09.2008, 10:35



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 975

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
Taran
QuoteSo would you say that USA should be in IRaq seeing as that has a UN mandate?

Only after the invasion and occupation. To pull out would have been to create a power vacuum and certain civil war. The crime is not in staying, although this is undoubtedly fuel to the fire, the troops there should be UN, but in the initial military action.

That aside, what do you think should happen when a civilian city comes under assault by artillery and rockets, regardless of where or when this occurs.

Secondly, should the peace keepers standby as they are also targeted or should they intervene? Bearing in mind their remit is to prevent military action of this type.


Why should there be UN troops in IRaq, but not USA or British troops?

When a civilian city comes under attack, that is bad, when peace keepers are targeted they should intervene. Russia exceeded its mandate and occupued South Ossetia, Abkhazia and have declared UDI
Top  Profile send PM
 
P_Trembath Posted: 29.09.2008, 12:55

P_Trembath

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 1071

Status: online
ilovehelstonWhen a civilian city comes under attack, that is bad, when peace keepers are targeted they should intervene. Russia exceeded its mandate and occupued South Ossetia, Abkhazia and have declared UDI


How has Russia "declared" UDI in Ossetia and Abkhazia?



Kernow Kensa!


Our day will come!


"Everyone has their own particular part to play. No part is too great or too small, no one is too old or too young to do something."
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 Next Page


Users online:
pfishwick - truru - Bardh - morvran - ThingsThatGoFlirInTheShla - P_Trembath - marhak - Shaz - Shiner - FreakoMbiko - Hunlef

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views