search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  The Rest of the World ::  WWIII inevitable?
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 Next Page
Bottom 

WWIII inevitable?

ilovehelston Posted: 07.10.2008, 18:28



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
Allister
Quoteso, before I take this argument any further, you show me first, where you get your information from. urls please.


ILH, I also asked you for proof, twice, and all you can offer is...

www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes


You got anything that contradicts my facts


Yes, www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes



Oh yeah


I am so glad that you agree with me.


Show me where wikipedia contradicts me
Top  Profile send PM
 
P_Trembath Posted: 07.10.2008, 19:32

P_Trembath

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 1080

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
Allister
Quoteso, before I take this argument any further, you show me first, where you get your information from. urls please.


ILH, I also asked you for proof, twice, and all you can offer is...

www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes


You got anything that contradicts my facts


Yes, www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes



Oh yeah


I am so glad that you agree with me.


Show me where wikipedia contradicts me


NO, you show me where it agrees with you.



Kernow Kensa!


Our day will come!


"Everyone has their own particular part to play. No part is too great or too small, no one is too old or too young to do something."
Top  Profile send PM
 
Coady Posted: 07.10.2008, 19:42

Coady

registered: May. 2006
Posts: 2107

Status: offline
last visit: 08.01.09
You know....I THINK ILH could just be the most sophisticated troll ever seen on this site, someone who has had so many 'spinning' for so long......

Fantastic!

We live in interesting times.
Top  Profile send PM
 
P_Trembath Posted: 07.10.2008, 20:28

P_Trembath

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 1080

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
CoadyYou know....I THINK ILH could just be the most sophisticated troll ever seen on this site, someone who has had so many 'spinning' for so long......

Fantastic!


Why does everyone pick on ilovehelston?

Is it not wrong to mock the afflicted?



edited by: P_Trembath, Oct 07, 2008 - 08:35 PM



Kernow Kensa!


Our day will come!


"Everyone has their own particular part to play. No part is too great or too small, no one is too old or too young to do something."
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 07.10.2008, 21:31



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
[quote=P_Trembath]
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
Allister
Quoteso, before I take this argument any further, you show me first, where you get your information from. urls please.


ILH, I also asked you for proof, twice, and all you can offer is...

www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes


You got anything that contradicts my facts


Yes, www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes



Oh yeah


I am so glad that you agree with me.


Show me where wikipedia contradicts me




No, the onus is on you to show me where i have gone wrong
Top  Profile send PM
 
Allister Posted: 07.10.2008, 21:54

Allister

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 606

Status: online
ILH, you've been shown where you are wrong on numerous occasions.

You offer Wiki in support of your argument and then ask PT, "show me where wiki contradicts me".

I think it was Taran who gave a wiki-link to a page dedicated to the Israeli apartheid...

Here it is again...

http://en.wikip...li_Apartheid

Now, the above contradicts your position...






I am awake at 4am to the terrifying undeniable truth that there is nothing I can do to stop the monster
Top  Profile send PM
 
P_Trembath Posted: 07.10.2008, 22:45

P_Trembath

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 1080

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
[quote=ilovehelston]
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
Allister
Quoteso, before I take this argument any further, you show me first, where you get your information from. urls please.


ILH, I also asked you for proof, twice, and all you can offer is...

www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes


You got anything that contradicts my facts


Yes, www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes



Oh yeah


I am so glad that you agree with me.


Show me where wikipedia contradicts me




No, the onus is on you to show me where i have gone wrong


No, it was you who gave the link www.wikipedia.org as proof that your argument was/is correct.

If you follow that link, you will find that it goes to the title page of the free encyclopedia called "Wikipedia". An encyclopedia, incidentally, that is written by the user, and contains a great deal of opinion, as opposed to fact. An encyclopedia that those with intelligence will use to give themselves pointers to further material, some of it source material, in order for them to make up their own minds, and they will rarely use it as a "proof" to their arguments. In fact, if you were to use Wikipedia as a reference in an academic paper, you would find that your paper would be treated with the contempt that it deserved, ripped into squares and hung for use in the outside dunny.

So, you offer, as evidence of your position, the title page of an online, suspect, encyclopedia, and expect it to be accepted as such. Might I suggest, that if you wish to be taken, even remotely, seriously, that you provide the links to the relevant articles on said encyclopedia, so that other posters are able to follow your argument, and then be able to either agree with your findings, or refute them with references of their own.

You have been called a troll on a few occasions on this board, I have to say that it is a description of you that I am in complete disagreement with. To suggest that you are a troll, is to credit you with a modicum of intelligence, a level of intelligence that I fear you can only aspire to, with little chance of achieving your goal. My 11 year old son is far more competent in putting forward a balanced, well referenced, argument than you.

To put it bluntly, either put up, or shut up.



Kernow Kensa!


Our day will come!


"Everyone has their own particular part to play. No part is too great or too small, no one is too old or too young to do something."
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 08.10.2008, 09:35



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
AllisterILH, you've been shown where you are wrong on numerous occasions.

You offer Wiki in support of your argument and then ask PT, "show me where wiki contradicts me".

I think it was Taran who gave a wiki-link to a page dedicated to the Israeli apartheid...

Here it is again...

http://en.wikip...li_Apartheid

Now, the above contradicts your position...




You obvisouly have not read the article. Apartheid was the theory of races bing set apart. Notice the key wordrace

Then you would state that Isreali Arabs are of a different race to Jewish people?

Well this shows that, in Isreal, all are equal

Political rights, voting and representation
Israeli citizenship law does not differentiate between Israeli citizens based on ethnicity. Formally therefore, Arab citizens of Israel have the same rights as all other Israeli citizens, including suffrage, political representation, and recourse to the courts.[9] The Knesset (Israel's legislature) includes Arab members and Arab parties. Although Arab parties allied to Mapai were members of the first and second government coalitions in Israel, no independent Arab party has ever been part of a coalition government.[60][61]


italics added
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 08.10.2008, 09:36



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
[quote=P_Trembath]
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
Allister
Quoteso, before I take this argument any further, you show me first, where you get your information from. urls please.


ILH, I also asked you for proof, twice, and all you can offer is...

www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes


You got anything that contradicts my facts


Yes, www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes



Oh yeah


I am so glad that you agree with me.


Show me where wikipedia contradicts me




No, the onus is on you to show me where i have gone wrong


No, it was you who gave the link www.wikipedia.org as proof that your argument was/is correct.

If you follow that link, you will find that it goes to the title page of the free encyclopedia called "Wikipedia". An encyclopedia, incidentally, that is written by the user, and contains a great deal of opinion, as opposed to fact. An encyclopedia that those with intelligence will use to give themselves pointers to further material, some of it source material, in order for them to make up their own minds, and they will rarely use it as a "proof" to their arguments. In fact, if you were to use Wikipedia as a reference in an academic paper, you would find that your paper would be treated with the contempt that it deserved, ripped into squares and hung for use in the outside dunny.

So, you offer, as evidence of your position, the title page of an online, suspect, encyclopedia, and expect it to be accepted as such. Might I suggest, that if you wish to be taken, even remotely, seriously, that you provide the links to the relevant articles on said encyclopedia, so that other posters are able to follow your argument, and then be able to either agree with your findings, or refute them with references of their own.

You have been called a troll on a few occasions on this board, I have to say that it is a description of you that I am in complete disagreement with. To suggest that you are a troll, is to credit you with a modicum of intelligence, a level of intelligence that I fear you can only aspire to, with little chance of achieving your goal. My 11 year old son is far more competent in putting forward a balanced, well referenced, argument than you.

To put it bluntly, either put up, or shut up.
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 08.10.2008, 09:36



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
[quote=P_Trembath]
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston
Allister
Quoteso, before I take this argument any further, you show me first, where you get your information from. urls please.


ILH, I also asked you for proof, twice, and all you can offer is...

www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes


You got anything that contradicts my facts


Yes, www.wikipedia.org

icon_rolleyes



Oh yeah


I am so glad that you agree with me.


Show me where wikipedia contradicts me




No, the onus is on you to show me where i have gone wrong


No, it was you who gave the link www.wikipedia.org as proof that your argument was/is correct.

If you follow that link, you will find that it goes to the title page of the free encyclopedia called "Wikipedia". An encyclopedia, incidentally, that is written by the user, and contains a great deal of opinion, as opposed to fact. An encyclopedia that those with intelligence will use to give themselves pointers to further material, some of it source material, in order for them to make up their own minds, and they will rarely use it as a "proof" to their arguments. In fact, if you were to use Wikipedia as a reference in an academic paper, you would find that your paper would be treated with the contempt that it deserved, ripped into squares and hung for use in the outside dunny.

So, you offer, as evidence of your position, the title page of an online, suspect, encyclopedia, and expect it to be accepted as such. Might I suggest, that if you wish to be taken, even remotely, seriously, that you provide the links to the relevant articles on said encyclopedia, so that other posters are able to follow your argument, and then be able to either agree with your findings, or refute them with references of their own.

You have been called a troll on a few occasions on this board, I have to say that it is a description of you that I am in complete disagreement with. To suggest that you are a troll, is to credit you with a modicum of intelligence, a level of intelligence that I fear you can only aspire to, with little chance of achieving your goal. My 11 year old son is far more competent in putting forward a balanced, well referenced, argument than you.

To put it bluntly, either put up, or shut up.
Top  Profile send PM
 
Griffin Posted: 08.10.2008, 09:52



registered: Jul. 2008
Posts: 405

Status: offline
last visit: 07.01.09
Errr, why did you post that twice and it looked like you added nothing?

QuoteWhy does everyone pick on ilovehelston?

Is it not wrong to mock the afflicted?

It isn't wrong to mock the stupid...

I'm sorry, ILH, but you're demonstrating to me time and time again that you are
1. Unable to present a logically thought out argument which is backed up by fact.
2. That you are totally unable to accept the opinions of anyone else if it is different to your own.
3. Wen asked to back your own views up with facts, not only are you unable to do so, but you go on the defenseve and demand instead that those who do not agree with you prove themselves instead of you.

Now either you really are that thick, and you have no idea that your behaviour is totally infuriating/amusing/annoying to most of us, or you're deliberately trying to do it....
so, which is it?


Unfortunately in England... icon_frown !

'Griffin Girl'[?]
"Cornish will take over your life. it does. Resistance is futile."
Click me
 
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
ilovehelston Posted: 08.10.2008, 16:24



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
[i][/i]
GriffinErrr, why did you post that twice and it looked like you added nothing?

QuoteWhy does everyone pick on ilovehelston?

Is it not wrong to mock the afflicted?

It isn't wrong to mock the stupid...

I'm sorry, ILH, but you're demonstrating to me time and time again that you are
1. Unable to present a logically thought out argument which is backed up by fact.
2. That you are totally unable to accept the opinions of anyone else if it is different to your own.
3. Wen asked to back your own views up with facts, not only are you unable to do so, but you go on the defenseve and demand instead that those who do not agree with you prove themselves instead of you.

Now either you really are that thick, and you have no idea that your behaviour is totally infuriating/amusing/annoying to most of us, or you're deliberately trying to do it....
so, which is it?


I am not thick, i am engaging in a debate

Tell me what the debate is and I will offer my opinoin about it and following facts!
Top  Profile send PM
 
P_Trembath Posted: 08.10.2008, 17:03

P_Trembath

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 1080

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
ilovehelston[i][/i]
GriffinErrr, why did you post that twice and it looked like you added nothing?

QuoteWhy does everyone pick on ilovehelston?

Is it not wrong to mock the afflicted?

It isn't wrong to mock the stupid...

I'm sorry, ILH, but you're demonstrating to me time and time again that you are
1. Unable to present a logically thought out argument which is backed up by fact.
2. That you are totally unable to accept the opinions of anyone else if it is different to your own.
3. Wen asked to back your own views up with facts, not only are you unable to do so, but you go on the defenseve and demand instead that those who do not agree with you prove themselves instead of you.

Now either you really are that thick, and you have no idea that your behaviour is totally infuriating/amusing/annoying to most of us, or you're deliberately trying to do it....
so, which is it?


I am not thick, i am engaging in a debate

Tell me what the debate is and I will offer my opinoin about it and following facts!


Should this reply not have been posted in the Cornwall24 Lite section?



Kernow Kensa!


Our day will come!


"Everyone has their own particular part to play. No part is too great or too small, no one is too old or too young to do something."
Top  Profile send PM
 
ilovehelston Posted: 08.10.2008, 20:48



registered: Mar. 2008
Posts: 1017

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
P_Trembath
ilovehelston[i][/i]
GriffinErrr, why did you post that twice and it looked like you added nothing?

QuoteWhy does everyone pick on ilovehelston?

Is it not wrong to mock the afflicted?

It isn't wrong to mock the stupid...

I'm sorry, ILH, but you're demonstrating to me time and time again that you are
1. Unable to present a logically thought out argument which is backed up by fact.
2. That you are totally unable to accept the opinions of anyone else if it is different to your own.
3. Wen asked to back your own views up with facts, not only are you unable to do so, but you go on the defenseve and demand instead that those who do not agree with you prove themselves instead of you.

Now either you really are that thick, and you have no idea that your behaviour is totally infuriating/amusing/annoying to most of us, or you're deliberately trying to do it....
so, which is it?


I am not thick, i am engaging in a debate

Tell me what the debate is and I will offer my opinoin about it and following facts!


Should this reply not have been posted in the Cornwall24 Lite section?



No this has gone off topic
Top  Profile send PM
 
P_Trembath Posted: 08.10.2008, 21:41

P_Trembath

registered: Oct. 2006
Posts: 1080

Status: offline
last visit: 05.01.09
ilovehelston
P_Trembath
ilovehelston[i][/i]
GriffinErrr, why did you post that twice and it looked like you added nothing?

QuoteWhy does everyone pick on ilovehelston?

Is it not wrong to mock the afflicted?

It isn't wrong to mock the stupid...

I'm sorry, ILH, but you're demonstrating to me time and time again that you are
1. Unable to present a logically thought out argument which is backed up by fact.
2. That you are totally unable to accept the opinions of anyone else if it is different to your own.
3. Wen asked to back your own views up with facts, not only are you unable to do so, but you go on the defenseve and demand instead that those who do not agree with you prove themselves instead of you.

Now either you really are that thick, and you have no idea that your behaviour is totally infuriating/amusing/annoying to most of us, or you're deliberately trying to do it....
so, which is it?


I am not thick, i am engaging in a debate

Tell me what the debate is and I will offer my opinoin about it and following facts!


Should this reply not have been posted in the Cornwall24 Lite section?



No this has gone off topic


Never did like Topic, always preferred a Mars.


It's the nuts you see, don't like nuts.

A Mars is sooooo much better.

Mind you, I much prefer a nice juicy pear, You bite into it, and it just melts in your mouth, the sweet juice runs down your chin, and drips on your shirt. Can't get them nowadays, there all hard and gritty. I blame the supermarkets.



Kernow Kensa!


Our day will come!


"Everyone has their own particular part to play. No part is too great or too small, no one is too old or too young to do something."
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 Next Page


Users online:
gokyreloaded - ThingsThatGoFlirInTheShla - Allister

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views