search pnForum latest posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts Note: Registered users can subscribe to notifications about new posts

to previous topic Print topic to next topic

Start ::  Cornwall24 Discussion ::  Cornish Language, Culture and History ::  Who are the Splitters?
Moderated by: Admins

Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 Next Page
Bottom 

Who are the Splitters?

pietercharles Posted: 08.09.2008, 10:45



registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 520

Status: offline
last visit: 12.10.08
goky'karrek','Kafus' kara' 'y Karsen' are also attested.

I didn't realise people were unaware of this.

There are lots of attestations of 'k' before 'a', 'o', 'u', 'l' and 'r'.

Why, even the word at the beginning of the name of the place west of Redruth can be found in the texts as 'kam' with a 'k' (alongside 'cam', of course).

These spellings with 'k' before 'a', 'o', 'u', 'l' and 'r' are traditional forms.

Recognising that fact may well present an excellent opportunity for bringing the SWF 'traditional form' a little more in line with the SWF 'main form' in five years' time.
Top  Profile send PM
 
pennysquire Posted: 08.09.2008, 14:01



registered: Aug. 2008
Posts: 198

Status: offline
last visit: 02.12.08
Just to remind everyone what this thread is supposed to be about... although the anti-KK caucus seem to want to throw up smokescreen after smokescreen rather than attempt to answer the points Morvran raises...

Penny

morvranWhen I explain, over and over as I must, that AT are the main cause of the split in the language movement, I'm accused (over and over) of lying. I'll therefore make a series of statements which I believe in good faith to be true -- in most cases I have or have seen documentary evidence. I'll then invite the AT fans here to rate each one as true or false. Where they disagree, I'd like them to explain their reasons.

So here we go :

1. Prior to 1987 the language movement was united (aside perhaps from a very few Late Cornish supporters) -- TRUE/FALSE ?

2. The Language Board had been established by the Gorsedh and FOCS to take over responsibility for the language revival. It was therefore the legitimate governing body for the language. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

3. The Language Fellowship was a membership organisation to which nearly everyone seriously interested in the Revival at that time belonged. It was open to all on payment of a small annual subscription. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

4. Its membership then included many who later opposed KK, inter alia, R. & D. Chubb, L. Climo, P.A.S. Pool, R & A. Jenkin, Rod Lyon etc. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

5. At this time Agan Tavas was a small exclusive club for fluent speakers, most if not all of whom were also members of the Language Fellowship -- TRUE/FALSE ?

6. The members of the Language Board who voted for KK had been elected a year or two earlier by the members of the Language Fellowship, and this election was a fair one. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

7. Ken George published "The Spelling & Pronunciation of Revived Cornish" towards the end of 1986, in which as a result of his previous researches for a doctorate, he proposed that UC be replaced by a new orthography, later to be called Kernewek Kemmyn -- TRUE/FALSE ?

8. There followed several months of discussion during which Ken's proposals were widely debated within the language community -- TRUE/FALSE ?

9. In autumn 1987 the Language Board met and agreed to change from UC to KK over the next few years, continuing exams in UC while there was demand. Only the late Richard Jenkin voted against. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

10. The great majority of Cornish users/learners took up KK enthusiastically. There was immediate demand for materials, and the change-over was quicker than had been anticipated. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

11. All of the people mentioned in (4) above remained members of the Language Fellowship, as did others (a small minority) who were opposed to KK -- TRUE/FALSE ?

12. A year or two after the decision to adopt KK, the Language Board was re-elected by the members of the Fellowship. This election was fair. All the Board members who stood again were re-elected apart from Richard Jenkin. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

13. This can be seen as a vote of confidence in the Language Board by the Fellowship membership, and as support for the change to KK -- TRUE/FALSE ?

14. Membership of the Language Fellowship is and always has been open to anyone on payment of a small annual subscription. If the Fellowship membership was unrepresentative of the movement as a whole, anti-KK supporters had ample time to recruit more support for their POV -- TRUE/FALSE ?

15. This did not happen and has not happened down to the present day. Fellowship members remain strongly in favour of KK (e.g. Kowethas Survey 2005) -- TRUE/FALSE ?

16. As a result, the Language Board members elected by the Fellowship membership over the years have continued their support for KK (and 'legacy' support for UC) -- TRUE/FALSE ?

17. Agan Tavas was re-created as a society for people opposed to KK (whereas the Language fellowship remained open to all) -- TRUE/FALSE ?

18. Agan Tavas, and several of it's prominent members have persistently campaigned against KK and the legitimacy of the Language Board, loudly and publically, and continue to do so. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

19. As a consequence, the language movement is perceived as being split, especially from the outside. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

20. This 'split' was seized upon by the government as an excuse for delaying funding for the Cornish Language. For setting up the "Partnership", and for sidelining the Language Board. That is replacing a native democratic institution by a quango of mostly non-Cornish speakers. -- TRUE/FALSE ?

21. The antics of AT members (and one or two Late Cornish supporters) are therefore largely to blame for the mess we're currently in. They set their own personal animosities above the views of most Cornish speakers and the unity of the movement as a whole. They engineered the split, and institutionalised it by setting up the 'new' Agan Tavas. They have worked tirelessly to ensure that reconciliation is impossible (just look at their posts here!). And whether they realise it or not, they have played straight into the hands of those opposed to the Cornish Language and Cornish identity -- TRUE/FALSE ?

Please show where I have my facts or logic wrong. (Pictures of baboons bottoms will be understood to imply total agreement with the above).







edited by: morvran, Aug 29, 2008 - 03:08 PM
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 08.09.2008, 18:56

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 4081

Status: offline
last visit: 02.12.08
Camborne, with a K is attested once and once only from a total of 37 attestations (Kameron 1252). For those who like to invoke majorities, that's a loser. The majority form is Cambron, attested 15 times over 7 centuries.
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 08.09.2008, 19:21

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1828

Status: offline
last visit: 09.11.08
yea, but surely once is enough,usually just once is OK for NJW, at least you cannot call it fake or made up Cornish if it has been attested.

The blog The Great Goky Blog
Top  Profile send PM
 
marhak Posted: 09.09.2008, 10:55

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 4081

Status: offline
last visit: 02.12.08
15 times out of 37 is much better.
Top  Profile send PM
 
GoghiennVarow Posted: 10.09.2008, 01:18

GoghiennVarow

registered: Sep. 2006
Posts: 166

Status: offline
last visit: 10.09.08
QuoteYes, 'beis' is attested.


No, no, no you are missing my point entirely, you are accountants of language and you are killing this one. You are like a 19th century butterfly collector who wipes out a species in order to catalogue it.
Top  Profile send PM Homepage
 
marhak Posted: 11.09.2008, 20:14

marhak

registered: Jun. 2006
Posts: 4081

Status: offline
last visit: 02.12.08
OK, OK
1. True
2. True (until 1987). The Language Board was set up for THE Cornish language. Once it decided to support one new, artificial form, pay lip service to Unified and utterly ignore the rest, it lost that mandate. As a result it now has no greater status than does Agan Tavas or Cussel an Tavas Kernuack.
3. Can't comment - I'd never heard of it back then.
4. Can't comment for the same reason.
5. Ditto, but I have been told that this is not strictly true.
6. Can't comment - wasn't there.
7. Sadly true.
8. True, but informal discussion only, rather than any official or organised programme of discussion (see cases for and against in Old Cornwall editions of the time: one for (Brown) and two against (Pool and Gendall), as I recall).
9. Can't comment, wasn't there. Like all too many, wasn't told about it. Was this minuted?
10. False. Many took it up. Many didn't. You will have to prove the "great majority" bit.
11. Can't comment. I haven't a clue who were members and who were not. Are there records?
12.Can't comment, wasn't there. Is this minuted?
13. Can't comment. How many Fellowship members had dropped out in the interim?
14. As above - how many people wishing to use traditional forms had dropped out of the Fellowship?
15. True - because many non-KK users had dropped out.
16. True, on the face of it, but then Robert Mugabe got "re-elected" despite the majority vote against him. And George W. Bush first time round, despite the majority vote against him. And the Board is now proposing to drop all exams in UC, making it totally exclusive of anything but KK. True or false?
17. False. Agan Tavas was founded for those who wished to continue using traditional forms of Cornish, as stated in its constitution which contains nothing about opposing KK, or even mentions KK at all. Remember that the Board was no longer catering for the needs and preferences of those people and they needed a body that did. The Board would not listen to their viewpoint, and so they formed that body. They were given no other choice.
18. True. And for extremely good reasons. So have members of Cussel an Tavas Kernuack. And Teere ha Tavas.
19. False - not "as a consequence" which suggests that your version of events under 18 above created the split. They didn't. The split had already taken place due to most language users having been given no say in the matter. Agan Tavas did not create the split. The CLB of the time did, by embracing the supporters of one form and either rejecting the rest or paying them mere lip service.
20. False. The reluctance of the UK govt. to add Cornish to the European Charter was due to their wish not to recognise it. To do so would be to recognise the Cornish as not being "English". Only years of persistent pressure from ALL language movements got the job done. It had nothing whatsoever to do with the split. No funding has been delayed since then, as, apart from the small sum that has been made available, none has been specifically allocated.
21. Utterly, utterly false. And you know it.

Right, there are my answers which are honest, unlike several of your "questions" (actually statements, many of them loaded). And they won't change. Some might moan about that but they shouldn't have insisted on people like me responding, should they? As the forces say when under fire: "If you can't take a joke, you shouldn't have joined".













edited by: marhak, Sep 12, 2008 - 09:34 AM
Top  Profile send PM
 
fwltur Posted: 13.09.2008, 04:38



registered: Apr. 2007
Posts: 178

Status: offline
last visit: 13.09.08
morvranI'm telling you what I understood was to happen, and what as a Kesva member I implicitly agreed to. If that wasn't what happened then it's yet another case of the Partnership failing to make things work as agreed. I'm sure Ben was not appointed as a member of the panel. He was supposed to have the same role as Albert. Possibly Trond took technical advise from him because he was on the spot. I can see this might have happened, but I would consider it slightly out of order.


Here is the official list of the AHG members from the MAGA site:

Trond Trosterud Arbiter appointed by the Partnership
Albert Bock Assistant

Jori Ansell nominated by Kesva an Taves Kernewek
Ben Bruch Kernewek Dasunys
Andrew Climo nominated by Agan Tavas
Bernard Deacon nominated by Cussel an Tavaz Kernuak
Mina Dresser nominated by Cussel an Tavaz Kernuak
Pol Hodge nominated by Kesva an Taves Kernewek
Loveday Jenkin nominated by Kowethas an Yeth Kernewek
Rod Lyon nominated by Agan Tavas
Polin Pris nominated by Kowethas an Yeth Kernewek
Jenefer Lowe Partnership note-taker.


Top  Profile send PM
 
Taran Posted: 13.09.2008, 11:58

Taran

registered: Jun. 2007
Posts: 316

Status: offline
last visit: 30.11.08
TT (Chair - neutral)
JL (Assistant - neutral)
AB (Technical Assistant - Worked on KK based Dasunys with BB)
BB (KK, Dasunys co-author)

JA (KK)
PH (KK)
LJ (KK)
PP (KK)
BD (RLC)
MD (RLC)
RL (UC)
AC (UC/UCR)

As is quite clear the committee had a clear bias to KK, with proponents and those with their primary Cornish experience based on KK weighting the committee.

KS technical advisers were largely ignored and prevented from participating in the discussions by LJ and her supporters. This has been documented elsewhere. The Breton advisers also complained of being ignored.

The committee leadership also unilaterally extended its remit to add a principle of conservation into its aims, primarily to weight KK word forms still further.

(b.t.w. I thought Ben was a technical advisor like Albert, rather than a full committee member?)



edited by: Taran, Sep 13, 2008 - 11:58 AM
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 13.09.2008, 14:11

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1828

Status: offline
last visit: 09.11.08
Ha, pyth o an diwedh??

The blog The Great Goky Blog
Top  Profile send PM
 
morsarf Posted: 13.09.2008, 17:17

morsarf

registered: May. 2008
Posts: 42

Status: offline
last visit: 22.11.08
Could someone perhaps explain why KK had 4 reps
when the Kowethas and CLB are basically one and the same. Some of us thought the AHG was supposed to be representative of each orthography not organisation. Strikes me someone moved the fences.
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 13.09.2008, 17:54

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1828

Status: offline
last visit: 09.11.08
Quotewhen the Kowethas and CLB are basically one and the same
um, no, they are different.Members of the Kowethas are not members of the CLB as well.I thought I would mention that little detail,as you seem a bit misinformed.

The blog The Great Goky Blog
Top  Profile send PM
 
morsarf Posted: 13.09.2008, 18:13

morsarf

registered: May. 2008
Posts: 42

Status: offline
last visit: 22.11.08
Quote.Members of the Kowethas are not members of the CLB as well.I thought I would mention that little detail,as you seem a bit misinformed.

Sorry that's where you're wrong, one of the Kowethas reps is a member of the CLB and has been for some time.
Top  Profile send PM
 
morsarf Posted: 13.09.2008, 18:16

morsarf

registered: May. 2008
Posts: 42

Status: offline
last visit: 22.11.08
Further to that on the Kowethas committee
Top  Profile send PM
 
goky Posted: 13.09.2008, 18:17

goky

registered: May. 2007
Posts: 1828

Status: offline
last visit: 09.11.08
Yes but he was not representing the CLB but the Kowethas.You said the were basically one and the same, which they are not.


The blog The Great Goky Blog
Top  Profile send PM
 
Goto page : Previous Page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 Next Page


Users online:
Coady - Eddie-C - ThingsThatGoFlirInTheShla - P_Trembath - Shaz - Shiner - portbyhan - PenwithAl

This list bases on the users active in the last 60 minutes
Cornwall24 2006 (c) web design & web hosting by a-connect
Sponsors: Cornwall hotels, Cornwall self-catering, Cornwall restaurant guide,Devon
Cornwall 24 news feed
Cornwall 24 News and Views